Analgesic effectiveness of methoxyflurane inhaler during genicular nerve block in knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial
Issued Date
2024-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
10987339
eISSN
15328651
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85204197014
Pubmed ID
39174051
Journal Title
Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (2024)
Suggested Citation
Sawang S., Kimpee P., Itthichaikulthol W., Tontisirin N., Limpoon S., Seangrung R., Pasutharnchat K., Cohen S.P. Analgesic effectiveness of methoxyflurane inhaler during genicular nerve block in knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (2024). doi:10.1136/rapm-2024-105777 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/101399
Title
Analgesic effectiveness of methoxyflurane inhaler during genicular nerve block in knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Background Up to 30% of patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) have evidence of sensitization, with a similar proportion experiencing severe pain during procedures. Most patients with KOA are elderly and often develop side effects from intravenous sedation. Our study investigated the effectiveness of a methoxyflurane inhaler combined with local anesthesia in reducing procedural pain from genicular nerve block compared with local anesthesia alone. Methods 42 adults with refractory KOA were randomized into two groups. Methoxyflurane group received a self-titrated methoxyflurane inhaler with local anesthesia whereas lidocaine group received local anesthesia only. The primary outcome was pain score on a 0–10 verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS) during the procedure. Secondary outcomes included changes in VNRS and behavioral pain scale (critical care pain observational tool) during the procedure, hemodynamic changes, anxiety level, sedation score, and adverse events. Results 42 patients with a mean age of 66±12 years participated in this study. There were no significant baseline differences. During the procedure, the methoxyflurane group experienced a significantly greater VNRS pain reduction from baseline (2 (1, 4) vs −1 (−2, 0); p<0.01) and greater VNRS reduction over time (p=0.01) compared with the lidocaine group, with a higher sedation score (p<0.01). Immediately postprocedure, anxiety levels were lower in the methoxyflurane group compared with the lidocaine group (median State-Trait Anxiety Inventory score 21 (IQR 20, 24) vs 27 (23, 29); p=0.02), but the median reduction in anxiety level was not significant (6 (1, 12) vs 5 (0, 14); p=0.61). There were no differences in behavioral pain scores, hemodynamic parameters, recovery or discharge times, and adverse effects between the two groups. Conclusion A methoxyflurane inhaler combined with local anesthesia provided better procedural pain control than local anesthesia alone with no observable differences in adverse effects. Future studies evaluating the impact of a methoxyflurane inhaler on different types of painful procedures are warranted.