Better engagement, better evidence: working in partnership with patients, the public, and communities in clinical trials with involvement and good participatory practice

dc.contributor.authorGobat N.
dc.contributor.authorSlack C.
dc.contributor.authorHannah S.
dc.contributor.authorSalzwedel J.
dc.contributor.authorBladon G.
dc.contributor.authorBurgos J.G.
dc.contributor.authorPurvis B.
dc.contributor.authorMolony-Oates B.
dc.contributor.authorSiegfried N.
dc.contributor.authorCheah P.Y.
dc.contributor.authorConway M.
dc.contributor.authorKamuya D.
dc.contributor.authorDavies A.
dc.contributor.authorJohnson T.
dc.contributor.authorTholanah M.
dc.contributor.authorMugamba S.
dc.contributor.authorMutengu N.L.
dc.contributor.authorMachingaidze S.
dc.contributor.authorSchwartz L.
dc.contributor.authorRägo L.
dc.contributor.authorvon Harbou K.
dc.contributor.correspondenceGobat N.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-03T18:12:52Z
dc.date.available2025-04-03T18:12:52Z
dc.date.issued2025-04-01
dc.description.abstractIn May 2022, member states of WHO adopted the World Health Assembly WHA75.8 resolution on strengthening clinical trials to provide high-quality evidence on health interventions and to improve research quality and coordination. The resolution recognises the central role of community stakeholders in the clinical trial ecosystem. This paper aims to take stock of the state of the field and define key actions from stakeholders across the clinical trial ecosystem for systematic engagement of patient, public, and community stakeholders in clinical trials. Upfront, sustained, inclusive, and meaningful engagement with patients, public, and community stakeholders intended to benefit from trial outcomes is crucial for several reasons. First, better engagement ensures that trials are well designed and well implemented by considering the unique perspectives and experiences of those they aim to benefit. Second, better engagement enhances the scientific, ethical, and pragmatic value of trials by improving the acceptability, feasibility, and relevance of trial design, implementation, and outcome dissemination. Lastly, improving engagement fosters trust in science and scientists, strengthens research literacy, and contributes to greater trust in research processes. This trust is particularly important in public health emergencies where the urgency for identifying effective interventions, including new vaccines and medicines, often results in limited engagement. In practice, engagement involves activities throughout the trial lifecycle, including research agenda setting, protocol development, trial conduct, and outcome dissemination. Key stakeholders, such as researchers, funders, research ethics committees, and regulators play crucial roles in enabling and implementing engagement via participatory practices. Despite some key markers of progress, challenges remain, including systemic gaps, limited engagement beyond tokenistic involvement, and structural inequities. Addressing these challenges requires action across the clinical trial ecosystem, including strengthening policies, enhancing funding mechanisms, improving regulatory oversight, advocacy, and education of all stakeholders about engagement, and promoting a strong culture of engagement. Advancing the agenda for engagement can promote trust, ethical research conduct, and improve outcomes and wider uptake of findings.
dc.identifier.citationThe Lancet Global Health Vol.13 No.4 (2025) , e716-e731
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00521-7
dc.identifier.eissn2214109X
dc.identifier.issn2572116X
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105000992719
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/109330
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleBetter engagement, better evidence: working in partnership with patients, the public, and communities in clinical trials with involvement and good participatory practice
dc.typeReview
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105000992719&origin=inward
oaire.citation.endPagee731
oaire.citation.issue4
oaire.citation.startPagee716
oaire.citation.titleThe Lancet Global Health
oaire.citation.volume13
oairecerif.author.affiliationMakerere University Walter Reed Project
oairecerif.author.affiliationMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit
oairecerif.author.affiliationPenta Foundation
oairecerif.author.affiliationEuropean Medicines Agency
oairecerif.author.affiliationMcMaster University
oairecerif.author.affiliationSouth African Medical Research Council
oairecerif.author.affiliationOrganisation Mondiale de la Santé
oairecerif.author.affiliationNuffield Department of Medicine
oairecerif.author.affiliationInternational Pandemic Preparedness Secretariat
oairecerif.author.affiliationHealth Research Authority
oairecerif.author.affiliationHarare Health and Research Consortium
oairecerif.author.affiliationThe African Alliance
oairecerif.author.affiliationWellcome
oairecerif.author.affiliationCouncil for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS)
oairecerif.author.affiliationScience for Africa Foundation (SFA)
oairecerif.author.affiliationAVAC
oairecerif.author.affiliationKEMRI-Wellcome Trust Collaborative Research Programme

Files

Collections