Pharmacogenomics of Preeclampsia therapies: Current evidence and future challenges for clinical implementation

dc.contributor.authorChaemsaithong P.
dc.contributor.authorBiswas M.
dc.contributor.authorLertrut W.
dc.contributor.authorWarintaksa P.
dc.contributor.authorWataganara T.
dc.contributor.authorPoon L.C.
dc.contributor.authorSukasem C.
dc.contributor.correspondenceChaemsaithong P.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-08T18:12:36Z
dc.date.available2024-02-08T18:12:36Z
dc.date.issued2024-02-01
dc.description.abstractPreeclampsia is a pregnancy-specific disorder, and it is a leading cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. The application of pharmacogenetics to antihypertensive agents and dose selection in women with preeclampsia is still in its infancy. No current prescribing guidelines from the clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium (CPIC) exist for preeclampsia. Although more studies on pharmacogenomics are underway, there is some evidence for the pharmacogenomics of preeclampsia therapies, considering both the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of drugs used in preeclampsia. It has been revealed that the CYP2D6*10 variant is significantly higher in women with preeclampsia who are non-responsive to labetalol compared to those who are in the responsive group. Various genetic variants of PD targets, i.e., NOS3, MMP9, MMP2, TIMP1, TIMP3, VEGF, and NAMPT, have been investigated to assess the responsiveness of antihypertensive therapies in preeclampsia management, and they indicated that certain genetic variants of MMP9, TIMP1, and NAMPT are more frequently observed in those who are non-responsive to anti-hypertensive therapies compared to those who are responsive. Further, gene–gene interactions have revealed that NAMPT, TIMP1, and MMP2 genotypes are associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia, and they are more frequently observed in the non-responsive subgroup of women with preeclampsia. The current evidence is not rigorous enough for clinical implementation; however, an institutional or regional-based retrospective analysis of audited data may help close the knowledge gap during the transitional period from a traditional approach (a “one-size-fits-all” strategy) to the pharmacogenomics of preeclampsia therapies.
dc.identifier.citationBest Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology Vol.92 (2024)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2023.102437
dc.identifier.eissn15321932
dc.identifier.issn15216934
dc.identifier.pmid38103508
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85180103632
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/95736
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titlePharmacogenomics of Preeclampsia therapies: Current evidence and future challenges for clinical implementation
dc.typeReview
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85180103632&origin=inward
oaire.citation.titleBest Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology
oaire.citation.volume92
oairecerif.author.affiliationRamathibodi Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationSiriraj Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationPrince of Wales Hospital Hong Kong
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity of Liverpool
oairecerif.author.affiliationBumrungrad International Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity of Rajshahi
oairecerif.author.affiliationFaculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
oairecerif.author.affiliationBurapha University

Files

Collections