Socioeconomic inequalities associated with Geriatric syndrome in Thailand: The results of Fifth National Health Examination Survey

dc.contributor.authorSripaew S.
dc.contributor.authorAssanangkornchai S.
dc.contributor.authorNontarak J.
dc.contributor.authorChariyalertsak S.
dc.contributor.authorKessomboon P.
dc.contributor.authorTaneepanichskul S.
dc.contributor.authorNeelapaichit N.
dc.contributor.authorAekplakorn W.
dc.contributor.correspondenceSripaew S.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-18T18:15:00Z
dc.date.available2024-10-18T18:15:00Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-01
dc.description.abstractGeriatric syndrome (GS) is the prevalence of a group of phenotypes in older people. Functional decline, cognitive impairment, and frailty are common phenotypes that burden individuals, families, and the healthcare system. Policies targeting GS require information on socioeconomic background of older people, which is scarce in Thailand. We investigated socioeconomic inequality associated with GS using the concentration index and further explained the contributions of socioeconomic status and sociodemographic variables to inequality. Nationally representative data of 7,365 individuals aged 60 years and above from the 5th National Health Examination Survey of 2013 were analyzed. The survey used a physical examination, blood test, and questionnaire interviews to elicit personal information, health status, and household assets. The wealth index was used as the main indicator of socioeconomic status, and participants with missing wealth index data were excluded. Three GS phenotypes-frailty, functional impairment (FI) and neurocognitive dysfunction (NCD)-were included. An indirectly standardized concentration index (Cis) and a 95% confidence interval were used to represent the horizontal equity of the three phenotypes. Contributions to the concentration index (CC)-contribution to a more or less equitable GS distribution-were decomposed and shown in terms of percentage and direction. All GS phenotypes were found to be concentrated in the elderly poor (Cis of FI, frailty, and NCD = -0.068, -0.092, and -0.182, respectively). Work status contributes to a more equitable GS distribution in all the phenotypes (%CC in FI, frailty, and NCD = -1.7%, -5.1%, and -2.0%, respectively), whereas types of insurance schemes made bidirectional contributions to the equity of GS. Policies should be adopted to help prevent GS among poor individuals, provide them with an equal opportunity of access to health schemes and ensure opportunities for older Thai individuals to work.
dc.identifier.citationPloS one Vol.19 No.10 (2024) , e0311687
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0311687
dc.identifier.eissn19326203
dc.identifier.pmid39388408
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85206030377
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/101653
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMultidisciplinary
dc.titleSocioeconomic inequalities associated with Geriatric syndrome in Thailand: The results of Fifth National Health Examination Survey
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85206030377&origin=inward
oaire.citation.issue10
oaire.citation.titlePloS one
oaire.citation.volume19
oairecerif.author.affiliationRamathibodi Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationChulalongkorn University
oairecerif.author.affiliationFaculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University
oairecerif.author.affiliationFaculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University
oairecerif.author.affiliationMahidol University
oairecerif.author.affiliationChiang Mai University

Files

Collections