Features and outcomes of female and male patients requiring postcardiotomy extracorporeal life support

dc.contributor.authorMariani S.
dc.contributor.authorRavaux J.M.
dc.contributor.authorvan Bussel B.C.T.
dc.contributor.authorDe Piero M.E.
dc.contributor.authorvan Kruijk S.M.J.
dc.contributor.authorSchaefer A.K.
dc.contributor.authorWiedemann D.
dc.contributor.authorSaeed D.
dc.contributor.authorPozzi M.
dc.contributor.authorLoforte A.
dc.contributor.authorBoeken U.
dc.contributor.authorSamalavicius R.
dc.contributor.authorBounader K.
dc.contributor.authorHou X.
dc.contributor.authorBunge J.J.H.
dc.contributor.authorBuscher H.
dc.contributor.authorSalazar L.
dc.contributor.authorMeyns B.
dc.contributor.authorMazzeffi M.A.
dc.contributor.authorMatteucci S.
dc.contributor.authorSponga S.
dc.contributor.authorSorokin V.
dc.contributor.authorRusso C.
dc.contributor.authorFormica F.
dc.contributor.authorSakiyalak P.
dc.contributor.authorFiore A.
dc.contributor.authorCamboni D.
dc.contributor.authorRaffa G.M.
dc.contributor.authorDiaz R.
dc.contributor.authorWang I.w.
dc.contributor.authorJung J.S.
dc.contributor.authorBelohlavek J.
dc.contributor.authorPellegrino V.
dc.contributor.authorBianchi G.
dc.contributor.authorPettinari M.
dc.contributor.authorBarbone A.
dc.contributor.authorGarcia J.P.
dc.contributor.authorShekar K.
dc.contributor.authorWhitman G.J.R.
dc.contributor.authorLorusso R.
dc.contributor.authorHeuts S.
dc.contributor.authorConci L.
dc.contributor.authorSzalkiewicz P.
dc.contributor.authorLehmann S.
dc.contributor.authorKhalil J.
dc.contributor.authorObadia J.F.
dc.contributor.authorKalampokas N.
dc.contributor.authorJankuviene A.
dc.contributor.authorFlecher E.
dc.contributor.authorReis Miranda D.D.
dc.contributor.authorSriranjan K.
dc.contributor.authorHerr D.
dc.contributor.authorVedadi N.
dc.contributor.authorDi Eusanio M.
dc.contributor.authorMacLaren G.
dc.contributor.authorRamanathan K.
dc.contributor.authorCostetti A.
dc.contributor.authorSchmid C.
dc.contributor.authorCastillo R.
dc.contributor.authorGrus T.
dc.contributor.authorMikulenka V.
dc.contributor.authorSolinas M.
dc.contributor.correspondenceMariani S.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-28T18:16:49Z
dc.date.available2024-06-28T18:16:49Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-01
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Although cardiogenic shock requiring extracorporeal life support after cardiac surgery is associated with high mortality, the impact of sex on outcomes of postcardiotomy extracorporeal life support remains unclear with conflicting results in the literature. We compare patient characteristics, in-hospital outcomes, and overall survival between females and males requiring postcardiotomy extracorporeal life support. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter (34 centers), observational study included adults requiring postcardiotomy extracorporeal life support between 2000 and 2020. Preoperative, procedural, and extracorporeal life support characteristics, complications, and survival were compared between females and males. Association between sex and in-hospital survival was investigated through mixed Cox proportional hazard models. Results: This analysis included 1823 patients (female: 40.8%; median age: 66.0 years [interquartile range, 56.2-73.0 years]). Females underwent more mitral valve surgery (females: 38.4%, males: 33.1%, P = .019) and tricuspid valve surgery (feamales: 18%, males: 12.4%, P < .001), whereas males underwent more coronary artery surgery (females: 45.9%, males: 52.4%, P = .007). Extracorporeal life support implantation was more common intraoperatively in feamales (females: 64.1%, females: 59.1%) and postoperatively in males (females: 35.9%, males: 40.9%, P = .036). Ventricular unloading (females: 25.1%, males: 36.2%, P < .001) and intra-aortic balloon pumps (females: 25.8%, males: 36.8%, P < .001) were most frequently used in males. Females had more postoperative right ventricular failure (females: 24.1%, males: 19.1%, P = .016) and limb ischemia (females: 12.3%, males: 8.8%, P = .23). In-hospital mortality was 64.9% in females and 61.9% in males (P = .199) with no differences in 5-year survival (females: 20%, 95% CI, 17-23; males: 24%, 95% CI, 21-28; P = .069). Crude hazard ratio for in-hospital mortality in females was 1.12 (95% CI, 0.99-1.27; P = .069) and did not change after adjustments. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that female and male patients requiring postcardiotomy extracorporeal life support have different preoperative and extracorporeal life support characteristics, as well as complications, without a statistical difference in in-hospital and 5-year survivals.
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (2024)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.04.033
dc.identifier.eissn1097685X
dc.identifier.issn00225223
dc.identifier.pmid38762034
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85196638421
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/99191
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleFeatures and outcomes of female and male patients requiring postcardiotomy extracorporeal life support
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85196638421&origin=inward
oaire.citation.titleJournal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
oairecerif.author.affiliationKorea University Anam Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationSiriraj Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationDepartement Cardiovasculaire Wetenschappen
oairecerif.author.affiliationIstituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione
oairecerif.author.affiliationNational University Health System
oairecerif.author.affiliationHeinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf Medizinische Fakultät
oairecerif.author.affiliationAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona
oairecerif.author.affiliationFundación Cardiovascular de Colombia
oairecerif.author.affiliationBeijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University
oairecerif.author.affiliationCARIM School for Cardiovascular Disease
oairecerif.author.affiliationZiekenhuis Oost-Limburg
oairecerif.author.affiliationVilniaus Universitetas
oairecerif.author.affiliationErasmus MC
oairecerif.author.affiliationKU Leuven– University Hospital Leuven
oairecerif.author.affiliationUNSW Sydney
oairecerif.author.affiliationHôpital Pontchaillou
oairecerif.author.affiliationSt. Vincent's Hospital Sydney
oairecerif.author.affiliationHumanitas Research Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationIndiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis
oairecerif.author.affiliationIRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
oairecerif.author.affiliationHôpital Henri Mondor
oairecerif.author.affiliationHerzzentrum Leipzig
oairecerif.author.affiliationKlinikum der Universität Regensburg und Medizinische Fakultät
oairecerif.author.affiliationClínica Las Condes
oairecerif.author.affiliationCharles University
oairecerif.author.affiliationAsst Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda
oairecerif.author.affiliationPoliclinico Universitario, Udine
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore (UMB)
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversità degli Studi di Torino
oairecerif.author.affiliationMedizinische Universität Wien
oairecerif.author.affiliationThe Alfred
oairecerif.author.affiliationMaastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum+
oairecerif.author.affiliationAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma
oairecerif.author.affiliationMemorial Healthcare System
oairecerif.author.affiliationThe Prince Charles Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine
oairecerif.author.affiliationOspedale del Cuore Fondazione Toscana “G. Monasterio,”
oairecerif.author.affiliationIRCCS San Gerardo
oairecerif.author.affiliationLouis Pradel Cardiologic Hospital

Files

Collections