Mental health professionals’ perspectives and suggestions on religious and superstitious activities engagement of patients with serious mental illness: A national survey in Thailand
Issued Date
2025-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
00207640
eISSN
17412854
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85215128416
Journal Title
International Journal of Social Psychiatry
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
International Journal of Social Psychiatry (2025)
Suggested Citation
Wainipitapong S., Hataiyusuk S., Khanthavudh C., Phetsayanavin V., Wiwattarangkul T., Aniwattanapong D. Mental health professionals’ perspectives and suggestions on religious and superstitious activities engagement of patients with serious mental illness: A national survey in Thailand. International Journal of Social Psychiatry (2025). doi:10.1177/00207640241311841 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/102971
Title
Mental health professionals’ perspectives and suggestions on religious and superstitious activities engagement of patients with serious mental illness: A national survey in Thailand
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Background: Patients with serious mental illness (SMI) often engage in religious and superstitious activities. The implications of such engagements remain unclear, with no established guidelines for mental health professionals. Aims: This study aimed to survey perspectives and gather suggestions from various disciplines within mental healthcare regarding the engagement in religious/superstitious activities of SMI patients: schizophrenia spectrum disorders, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder. Method: This cross-sectional study was conducted between November and December 2023 among Thai mental health professionals. Participants used 10-point Likert scales to rate their agreement levels for engaging each activity. Additional suggestions were obtained through textual responses, which were subsequently summarised and synthesised. Results: Of the 403 professionals participated, the majority were female (73.2%), Buddhist (87.6%) and psychiatrists (42.2%), with a median age of 34.0 years. Among patients with active symptoms, patients with major depressive disorder tended to receive the highest mean agreement scores for engagement, while patients with schizophrenia consistently scored the lowest across most activities. Similar trends were observed among patients in remission. From textual responses, two key themes were synthesised: (1) environmental factors and (2) impacts on natural courses. Conclusions: Patients with active schizophrenia received the lowest levels of agreement while patients with major depressive disorder tended to receive the highest mean agreement scores on engaging religious/superstitious activities.