Hidden in morphology, revealed by molecular genetics: Synonymisation of Gogatea burmanicus (Chatterji, 1940) with Gogatea serpentum (Gogate, 1932) (Digenea: Cyathocotylidae).

dc.contributor.authorViriyautsahakul S.
dc.contributor.authorCharoennitiwat V.
dc.contributor.authorChaisiri K.
dc.contributor.authorChan A.H.E.
dc.contributor.authorTippawan C.
dc.contributor.authorRibas A.
dc.contributor.authorLaoungbua P.
dc.contributor.authorTawan T.
dc.contributor.authorThaenkham U.
dc.contributor.authorRatnarathorn N.
dc.contributor.correspondenceViriyautsahakul S.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-18T18:16:19Z
dc.date.available2025-11-18T18:16:19Z
dc.date.issued2025-01-01
dc.description.abstractThe classification of the digenean genus Gogatea Lutz, 1935 has been complicated for almost a century due to morphological variability and reliance on limited diagnostic traits. This study re-evaluates the taxonomic status of Gogatea serpentum (Gogate, 1932) and Gogatea burmanicus (Chatterji, 1940) using an integrative framework combining morphology and molecular phylogenetics. Trematodes were recovered from the gallbladder and intestine of the rainbow water snake (Enhydris enhydris) in southern Thailand. Morphological investigations included morphometrics, acetocarmine-stained preparations, scanning electron microscopy, and multivariate analyses, while molecular analyses used mitochondrial COI and nuclear ITS2 and 28S rRNA markers. Both gonad-bearing and gonad-less individuals exhibited identical sequences across all markers, forming a strongly supported monophyletic group. Morphological variation was restricted to the presence or absence of gonads, with no separation detected by principal component analysis. These findings support the synonymisation of G. burmanicus as a junior synonym of G. serpentum (following the original spelling by Gogate, 1932, as validated under the ICZN). The occurrence of gonad less adults represents a biologically intriguing phenomenon, the causes of which remain unresolved but may involve developmental, host-related, or ecological factors. This study underscores the importance of combining molecular and morphological approaches for accurate delimitation of morphologically plastic digeneans. Updated morphological descriptions and molecular data for G. serpentum are provided, including morphometrics, staining profiles, SEM micrographs, and genetic sequences. These findings refine the taxonomy of Gogatea, advance knowledge of helminth diversity in semi aquatic snakes, and support broader efforts in parasite systematics, host–parasite ecology, and biodiversity monitoring in Southeast Asia.
dc.identifier.citationParasitology (2025)
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0031182025101054
dc.identifier.eissn14698161
dc.identifier.issn00311820
dc.identifier.pmid41194488
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105021050160
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/113065
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciences
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiology
dc.titleHidden in morphology, revealed by molecular genetics: Synonymisation of Gogatea burmanicus (Chatterji, 1940) with Gogatea serpentum (Gogate, 1932) (Digenea: Cyathocotylidae).
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105021050160&origin=inward
oaire.citation.titleParasitology
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitat de Barcelona
oairecerif.author.affiliationFaculty of Science, Mahidol University
oairecerif.author.affiliationFaculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University
oairecerif.author.affiliationQueen Saovabha Memorial Institute

Files

Collections