A comparison of super-resolution microscopy techniques for imaging tightly packed microcolonies of an obligate intracellular bacterium

dc.contributor.authorNorth A.J.
dc.contributor.authorSharma V.P.
dc.contributor.authorPyrgaki C.
dc.contributor.authorJohn Lim S.Y.
dc.contributor.authorAtwal S.
dc.contributor.authorSaharat K.
dc.contributor.authorWright G.D.
dc.contributor.authorSalje J.
dc.contributor.correspondenceNorth A.J.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-15T18:06:35Z
dc.date.available2024-12-15T18:06:35Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-01
dc.description.abstractConventional optical microscopy imaging of obligate intracellular bacteria is hampered by the small size of bacterial cells, tight clustering exhibited by some bacterial species and challenges relating to labelling such as background from host cells, a lack of validated reagents, and a lack of tools for genetic manipulation. In this study, we imaged intracellular bacteria from the species Orientia tsutsugamushi (Ot) using five different fluorescence microscopy techniques: standard confocal, Airyscan confocal, instant Structured Illumination Microscopy (iSIM), three-dimensional Structured Illumination Microscopy (3D-SIM) and Stimulated Emission Depletion Microscopy (STED). We compared the ability of each to resolve bacterial cells in intracellular clumps in the lateral (xy) axis, using full width half-maximum (FWHM) measurements of a labelled outer membrane protein (ScaA) and the ability to detect small, outer membrane vesicles external to the cells. Comparing the techniques readily available to us (above), 3D-SIM microscopy, in combination with the shortest-wavelength dyes, was found overall to give the best lateral resolution. We next compared the ability of each technique to sufficiently resolve bacteria in the axial (z) direction and found 3D-STED to be the most successful method for this. We then combined this 3D-STED approach with a custom 3D cell segmentation and analysis pipeline using the open-source, deep learning software, Cellpose to segment the cells and subsequently the commercial software Imaris to analyse their 3D shape and size. Using this combination, we demonstrated differences in bacterial shape, but not their size, when grown in different mammalian cell lines. Overall, we compare the advantages and disadvantages of different super-resolution microscopy techniques for imaging this cytoplasmic obligate intracellular bacterium based on the specific research question being addressed.
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Microscopy (2024)
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jmi.13376
dc.identifier.eissn13652818
dc.identifier.issn00222720
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85211358405
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/102396
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleA comparison of super-resolution microscopy techniques for imaging tightly packed microcolonies of an obligate intracellular bacterium
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85211358405&origin=inward
oaire.citation.titleJournal of Microscopy
oairecerif.author.affiliationA-Star, Skin Research Labs
oairecerif.author.affiliationMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit
oairecerif.author.affiliationCambridge Institute for Medical Research
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity of Cambridge
oairecerif.author.affiliationRockefeller University
oairecerif.author.affiliationAgency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore
oairecerif.author.affiliationMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
oairecerif.author.affiliationLonza

Files

Collections