Impact of COVID-19 on Mental Health: Post-Traumatic Stress and Coping Strategies Among Thai University Students Using Ordinal Logistic Regression Analysis
Issued Date
2025-07-01
Resource Type
eISSN
26883740
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-105004192493
Journal Title
Lifestyle Medicine
Volume
6
Issue
3
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Lifestyle Medicine Vol.6 No.3 (2025)
Suggested Citation
Thichanpiang P., Kaunnil A., Nuchnoi P., Nopparat C., Donjdee K., Permpoonputtana K. Impact of COVID-19 on Mental Health: Post-Traumatic Stress and Coping Strategies Among Thai University Students Using Ordinal Logistic Regression Analysis. Lifestyle Medicine Vol.6 No.3 (2025). doi:10.1002/lim2.70023 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/110042
Title
Impact of COVID-19 on Mental Health: Post-Traumatic Stress and Coping Strategies Among Thai University Students Using Ordinal Logistic Regression Analysis
Author's Affiliation
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Aims: COVID-19 disrupted education globally, resulting in the closure of schools and universities and the transition to distance learning. This shift heightened concerns about contracting the virus and increased insecurity in daily life and online education. The primary objective of this study is to investigate post-traumatic stress, perceived stress, coping strategies, and quality of life (QOL) among Thai university students, while also examining the relationships among coping strategies, stress levels, mental illness history, and overall QOL. Methods: This study utilized a cross-sectional survey method, engaging 400 students through an online self-reported survey. The survey instruments included the post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) checklist for DSM-5, the Thai Version of the Perceived Stress Scale, the Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory, and the WHOQOL Instrument-Short Form. Results: The study found that 21.25% of Thai university students likely experienced PTSD during the pandemic, with 74% reporting moderate stress and 4.25% experiencing high stress. Common coping strategies included acceptance, planning, active coping, self-distraction, and positive reframing, whereas self-blame was more prevalent among students with higher stress levels. QOL assessments showed that 2.75% of students rated their QOL as poor, 55.75% as moderate, and 41.50% as good. A strong negative correlation was observed between QOL and stress levels, indicating that students with lower QOL experienced higher stress. Additionally, maladaptive coping strategies, such as self-blame, denial, and behavioral disengagement, were positively associated with increased stress. Ordinal logistic regression analysis identified QOL as a significant predictor of perceived stress levels (odds ratios [OR] = 3.607), accounting for 31% of the variability in stress levels. Conclusions: Students with poorer QOL experienced higher stress levels, underscoring the need for enhanced psychosocial services to support their mental health and overall well-being.