Between Scare Quotes and Criminalization: Media Discourses of “Eco-Terrorism” (2020–2024)
Issued Date
2026-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
17524032
eISSN
17524040
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-105033614247
Journal Title
Environmental Communication
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Environmental Communication (2026)
Suggested Citation
Wuebben D., Nasrawin N., Meinhold R. Between Scare Quotes and Criminalization: Media Discourses of “Eco-Terrorism” (2020–2024). Environmental Communication (2026). doi:10.1080/17524032.2026.2648279 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/115985
Title
Between Scare Quotes and Criminalization: Media Discourses of “Eco-Terrorism” (2020–2024)
Author(s)
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
In print and online news media, “eco-terrorism,” has been invoked to delegitimize nonviolent civil disobedience, obstruction, and symbolic sabotage. As the climate crisis intensifies, it is increasingly important to clearly identify different forms of environmental harm and activist resistance. The current study performs a discourse analysis of articles from print and online news sources published between 2020 and 2024 and cataloged in LexisUni (n = 204). The results show that claims of “eco-terrorism” are often voiced by government officials, editorialists, or individual citizens writing letters to the editor; however, compared to previous research on media mentions in the United States between 1999 and 2009, professional journalists seem to contextualize or qualify claims of eco-terrorism more often, using “scare quotes” to implicitly question its validity. While this may somewhat lessen its rhetorical heft, the “terrorist” label and related criminalization of environmental activists charged under terrorism laws remain severe. Therefore, the persistent, uncritical usage of “eco-terrorism” and its continued conflation with “environmental terrorism” risks undermining democratic deliberation and public understanding of climate resistance. This research contributes to ongoing debates on media ethics and environmental justice while seeking a deeper understanding of the moral and scientific imperatives that motivate climate discourse.