Validation of scoring systems for the prediction of complicated appendicitis in adults using clinical and computed tomographic findings
Issued Date
2023-12-01
Resource Type
eISSN
18694101
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85177049653
Journal Title
Insights into Imaging
Volume
14
Issue
1
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Insights into Imaging Vol.14 No.1 (2023)
Suggested Citation
Kaewlai R., Tongsai S., Teerasamit W., Wongsaengchan D., Noppakunsomboon N., Khamman P., Chatkaewpaisal A., Apisarnthanarak P. Validation of scoring systems for the prediction of complicated appendicitis in adults using clinical and computed tomographic findings. Insights into Imaging Vol.14 No.1 (2023). doi:10.1186/s13244-023-01540-4 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/91184
Title
Validation of scoring systems for the prediction of complicated appendicitis in adults using clinical and computed tomographic findings
Author's Affiliation
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Objectives: The study aimed to evaluate scoring systems for predicting complicated appendicitis in adults diagnosed with acute appendicitis on computed tomography. Methods: Three hundred twenty-five consecutive adult patients (mean age 51.9 ± 19.6 years, 212 women) diagnosed with acute appendicitis on computed tomography were retrospectively included. Clinical and imaging findings were compared between patients with and without complicated appendicitis, and independent associations were identified. As C-reactive protein was not available for most patients, 5 out of 8 scoring systems were modified. They, and a newly proposed system, were compared via area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve (AUC), Additionally, the latter was internally validated. Pairwise comparison was performed, and diagnostic performance of these scoring systems was obtained. Results: One hundred twenty-seven patients (36.8%) had complicated appendicitis. Significant independent associations were found between complicated appendicitis and duration of symptoms > 12 h, appendicolith, periappendiceal fat stranding, periappendiceal fluid, and extraluminal air (p values < 0.001 to 0.037; AUCs of 0.824–0.829). AUCs of 9 scoring systems ranged from 0.692 to 0.831. Of these, modified Atema, Kim HY, and proposed scores had similarly high and non-significantly different AUCs (0.793–0.831) on pairwise comparison. Their sensitivities, specificities, and accuracies were 73.0–90.6%, 48.5–70.6%, and 64.3–72.3%, respectively. Internal validity test demonstrated high AUCs (0.826–0.844) with one of the proposed scores using odds ratio having 100% sensitivity and 100% negative predictive value. Conclusions: Few scoring systems, including proposed ones, had high AUCs, sensitivity, and reasonable specificities, which could potentially aid in safely selecting adult patients with acute appendicitis for nonoperative management. Critical relevance statement: The study suggests few scoring systems for predicting complicated appendicitis with high AUCs and reasonable sensitivities, potentially aiding in selecting patients for nonoperative management. Key points: • The study evaluated existing and proposed new scoring systems to predict complicated appendicitis in adults with acute appendicitis on computed tomography. • Several factors were found to be significantly associated with complicated appendicitis, including duration of symptoms, appendicolith, periappendiceal fat stranding, periappendiceal fluid, and extraluminal air. • The modified Atema, Kim HY, and newly proposed scoring systems performed well, potentially aiding in nonoperative management selection. Graphical Abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.]