Validation of the Thai version of the obstetric quality of recovery score (obsqor-10-Thai) after elective cesarean delivery

dc.contributor.authorDusitkasem S.
dc.contributor.authorJindapitak J.
dc.contributor.authorArnuntasupakul V.
dc.contributor.authorLekprasert V.
dc.contributor.authorBumrungphuet S.
dc.contributor.authorSukying C.
dc.contributor.authorKomonhirun R.
dc.contributor.authorSangkum L.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-19T07:48:31Z
dc.date.available2023-05-19T07:48:31Z
dc.date.issued2023-12-01
dc.description.abstractBackground: The Obstetric Quality of Recovery score (ObsQoR-10) is a questionnaire used to assess recovery after cesarean delivery. However, the original ObsQoR-10 is in English and was mainly validated in the Western population. We therefore evaluated the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the ObsQoR-10-Thai in patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery. Methods: The original ObsQoR-10 was translated into Thai, and psychometric validation was performed to evaluate the quality of post-cesarean recovery. The ObsQoR-10-Thai, activities of daily living checklist, and 100-mm visual analog scale of global health (VAS-GH) questionnaires were administered to the study participants before and 24 and 48-h postpartum. Validity, reliability, responsiveness, and feasibility of the ObsQoR-10-Thai were assessed. Results: We included 110 patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery. The mean ObsQoR-10-Thai score at baseline and 24 and 48-h postpartum was 83.35 ± 11.15, 56.75 ± 11.6, and 70.96 ± 13.65, respectively. The ObsQoR-10-Thai score differed significantly between the two groups divided based on the VAS-GH (≥ 70 vs. < 70): 75.58 ± 13.81 and 52.56 ± 10.61, respectively (P < 0.001). The convergent validity between the ObsQoR-10-Thai and VAS-GH was good (r = 0.60, P < 0.001). The ObsQoR-10-Thai displayed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.87), split-half reliability (0.92), and test–retest reliability (0.99, 95% CI: 0.98–0.99). The median time to complete the questionnaire was 2 (IQR, 1–6) min. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that the ObsQoR-10-Thai is valid and has good reliability, with a high degree of responsiveness in terms of assessment of recovery after elective cesarean delivery. Trial registration: This study was registered on the Thai Clinical Trials Registry, identifier TCTR20210204001, registered on 04/02/2021 (Prospectively registration).
dc.identifier.citationBMC Anesthesiology Vol.23 No.1 (2023)
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12871-023-02010-6
dc.identifier.eissn14712253
dc.identifier.pmid36882676
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85149524240
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/82017
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleValidation of the Thai version of the obstetric quality of recovery score (obsqor-10-Thai) after elective cesarean delivery
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85149524240&origin=inward
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.titleBMC Anesthesiology
oaire.citation.volume23
oairecerif.author.affiliationRamathibodi Hospital

Files

Collections