Correction: Melatonin Inhibits Hypoxia-Induced Alzheimer’s Disease Pathogenesis by Regulating the Amyloidogenic Pathway in Human Neuroblastoma Cells (International Journal of Molecular Sciences, (2024), 25, 10, (5225), 10.3390/ijms25105225)
Issued Date
2025-08-01
Resource Type
ISSN
16616596
eISSN
14220067
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-105013356252
Journal Title
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Volume
26
Issue
15
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
International Journal of Molecular Sciences Vol.26 No.15 (2025)
Suggested Citation
Singrang N., Nopparat C., Panmanee J., Govitrapong P. Correction: Melatonin Inhibits Hypoxia-Induced Alzheimer’s Disease Pathogenesis by Regulating the Amyloidogenic Pathway in Human Neuroblastoma Cells (International Journal of Molecular Sciences, (2024), 25, 10, (5225), 10.3390/ijms25105225). International Journal of Molecular Sciences Vol.26 No.15 (2025). doi:10.3390/ijms26157338 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/111826
Title
Correction: Melatonin Inhibits Hypoxia-Induced Alzheimer’s Disease Pathogenesis by Regulating the Amyloidogenic Pathway in Human Neuroblastoma Cells (International Journal of Molecular Sciences, (2024), 25, 10, (5225), 10.3390/ijms25105225)
Author(s)
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
In the original publication [1], there was a mistake in Figure 1a as published. The incorrect image was inadvertently used during final preparation. The corrected Figure 1a appears below. There was an error in the original publication [1]: a correction has been made to the Methods section, in the subsection “Statistical Analysis”: 4.9. Statistical Analysis For all the experiments, the data were analyzed, and statistical significance was determined using GraphPad Prism version 8.3.0. Differences between two groups were assessed using unpaired t tests (where equal variances were not assumed). Differences between multiple groups were assessed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test (where equal variances were not assumed). The data are expressed as the mean ± S.E.M. p values < 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.