Combination Versus Monotherapy for Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter Species Serious Infections: A Prospective IPTW Adjusted Cohort Study

dc.contributor.authorManesh A.
dc.contributor.authorGeorge M.M.
dc.contributor.authorPalanikumar P.
dc.contributor.authorNagaraj V.
dc.contributor.authorBhanuprasad K.
dc.contributor.authorKrishnan R.
dc.contributor.authorNivetha G.
dc.contributor.authorLal B.
dc.contributor.authorTriveni K.R.
dc.contributor.authorGautam P.
dc.contributor.authorGeorge B.
dc.contributor.authorKulkarni U.
dc.contributor.authorMathews V.
dc.contributor.authorSubramani K.
dc.contributor.authorRao S.
dc.contributor.authorChacko B.
dc.contributor.authorZachariah A.
dc.contributor.authorSathyendra S.
dc.contributor.authorHansdak S.G.
dc.contributor.authorAbraham O.C.
dc.contributor.authorIyadurai R.
dc.contributor.authorKarthik R.
dc.contributor.authorPeter J.V.
dc.contributor.authorMo Y.
dc.contributor.authorVeeraraghavan B.
dc.contributor.authorVarghese G.M.
dc.contributor.authorPaterson D.L.
dc.contributor.correspondenceManesh A.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-01T18:26:08Z
dc.date.available2024-10-01T18:26:08Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-01
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: International guidelines recommend definitive combination antibiotic therapy for the management of serious infections involving carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter (CRAB) species. The commonly available combination options include high-dose sulbactam, polymyxins, tetracyclines, and cefiderocol. Scanty prospective data exist to support this approach. Methods: Patients with CRAB bacteraemia, ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), or both were categorized based on whether they received combination therapy or monotherapy. The 30-day mortality was compared between the two groups. Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was done using propensity score (PS) for a balanced comparison between groups. Results: Between January 2021 and May 2023, of the 161 patients with CRAB bacteraemia (n = 55, 34.2%), VAP (n = 46, 28.6%), or both (n = 60, 37.3%) who received appropriate intravenous antibiotic therapy, 70% (112/161) received monotherapy, and the rest received combination therapy. The overall 30-day mortality was 62% (99/161) and not different (p = 0.76) between the combination therapy (31/49, 63.3%) and monotherapy (68/112, 60.7%) groups. The propensity score matching using IPTW did not show a statistical difference (p = 0.47) in 30-day mortality for receiving combination therapy with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) P of 1.29 (0.64, 2.58). Conclusion: Combination therapy for CRAB infections needs further study in a randomised controlled trial, as this observational study showed no difference in 30-day mortality between monotherapy and combination therapy.
dc.identifier.citationInfectious Diseases and Therapy (2024)
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s40121-024-01042-w
dc.identifier.eissn21936382
dc.identifier.issn21938229
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85204804608
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/101435
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleCombination Versus Monotherapy for Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter Species Serious Infections: A Prospective IPTW Adjusted Cohort Study
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85204804608&origin=inward
oaire.citation.titleInfectious Diseases and Therapy
oairecerif.author.affiliationMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit
oairecerif.author.affiliationNational University Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationNUS Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine
oairecerif.author.affiliationNational University of Singapore
oairecerif.author.affiliationNuffield Department of Medicine
oairecerif.author.affiliationChristian Medical College, Vellore

Files

Collections