High PEEP with recruitment maneuvers versus Low PEEP During General Anesthesia for Surgery -a Bayesian individual patient data meta-analysis of three randomized clinical trials

dc.contributor.authorMazzinari G.
dc.contributor.authorZampieri F.G.
dc.contributor.authorBall L.
dc.contributor.authorCampos N.S.
dc.contributor.authorBluth T.
dc.contributor.authorHemmes S.N.T.
dc.contributor.authorFerrando C.
dc.contributor.authorLibrero J.
dc.contributor.authorSoro M.
dc.contributor.authorPelosi P.
dc.contributor.authorde Abreu M.G.
dc.contributor.authorSchultz M.J.
dc.contributor.authorNeto A.S.
dc.contributor.authorCampos N.S.
dc.contributor.authorBluth T.
dc.contributor.authorHemmes S.N.T.
dc.contributor.authorde Abreu M.G.
dc.contributor.authorSchultz M.J.
dc.contributor.authorNeto A.S.
dc.contributor.authorCampos N.S.
dc.contributor.authorBluth T.
dc.contributor.authorHemmes S.N.T.
dc.contributor.authorLibrero J.
dc.contributor.authorPozo N.
dc.contributor.authorFerrando C.
dc.contributor.authorBall L.
dc.contributor.authorMazzinari G.
dc.contributor.authorde Abreu M.G.
dc.contributor.authorSchultz M.J.
dc.contributor.authorNeto A.S.
dc.contributor.authorHemmes S.N.T.
dc.contributor.authorde Abreu M.G.
dc.contributor.authorSevergnini P.
dc.contributor.authorHollmann M.W.
dc.contributor.authorBinnekade J.M.
dc.contributor.authorWrigge H.
dc.contributor.authorCanet J.
dc.contributor.authorHiesmayr M.
dc.contributor.authorSchmid W.
dc.contributor.authorTschernko E.
dc.contributor.authorJaber S.
dc.contributor.authorHedenstierna G.
dc.contributor.authorPutensen C.
dc.contributor.authorSchultz M.J.
dc.contributor.authorMarti A.
dc.contributor.authorBacuzzi A.
dc.contributor.authorBrodhun A.
dc.contributor.authorMolin A.
dc.contributor.authorMerten A.
dc.contributor.authorParera A.
dc.contributor.authorBrunelli A.
dc.contributor.authorCortegiani A.
dc.contributor.authorGüldner A.
dc.contributor.authorReske A.W.
dc.contributor.authorGratarola A.
dc.contributor.authorGiarratano A.
dc.contributor.authorBastin B.
dc.contributor.authorHeyse B.
dc.contributor.authorMazul-Sunko B.
dc.contributor.authorAmantea B.
dc.contributor.authorBarberis B.
dc.contributor.authorPutensen C.
dc.contributor.authorUhlig C.
dc.contributor.authorMarín C.M.
dc.contributor.authorCelentano C.
dc.contributor.authorLa Bella D.
dc.contributor.authorD'Antini D.
dc.contributor.authorVelghe D.
dc.contributor.authorSulemanji D.
dc.contributor.authorDe Robertis E.
dc.contributor.authorHartmann E.
dc.contributor.authorMontalto F.
dc.contributor.authorTropea F.
dc.contributor.authorMills G.H.
dc.contributor.authorCinnella G.
dc.contributor.authorDella Rocca G.
dc.contributor.authorCaggianelli G.
dc.contributor.authorPellerano G.
dc.contributor.authorMollica G.
dc.contributor.authorBugedo G.
dc.contributor.authorWrigge H.
dc.contributor.authorMulier J.P.
dc.contributor.authorVandenbrande J.
dc.contributor.authorGeib J.
dc.contributor.authorYaqub J.
dc.contributor.authorFlorez J.
dc.contributor.authorMayoral J.F.
dc.contributor.authorSprung J.
dc.contributor.authorVan Limmen J.
dc.contributor.authorBos L.D.J.
dc.contributor.authorde Baerdemaeker L.
dc.contributor.authorJamaer L.
dc.contributor.authorSpagnolo L.
dc.contributor.authorStrys L.
dc.contributor.authorGil M.G.
dc.contributor.authorde Abreu M.G.
dc.contributor.authorVidal Melo M.F.
dc.contributor.authorSchultz M.J.
dc.contributor.authorUnzueta M.C.
dc.contributor.authorMoral M.V.
dc.contributor.correspondenceMazzinari G.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-12T18:07:19Z
dc.date.available2024-08-12T18:07:19Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-01
dc.description.abstractBackground: The influence of high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with recruitment maneuvers on the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications after surgery is still not definitively established. Bayesian analysis can help to gain further insights from the available data and provide a probabilistic framework that is easier to interpret. Our objective was to estimate the posterior probability that the use of high PEEP with recruitment maneuvers is associated with reduced postoperative pulmonary complications in patients with intermediate-to-high risk under neutral, pessimistic, and optimistic expectations regarding the treatment effect. Methods: Multilevel Bayesian logistic regression analysis on individual patient data from three randomized clinical trials carried out on surgical patients at Intermediate-to-High Risk for postoperative pulmonary complications. The main outcome was the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications in the early postoperative period. We studied the effect of high PEEP with recruitment maneuvers versus Low PEEP Ventilation. Priors were chosen to reflect neutral, pessimistic, and optimistic expectations of the treatment effect. Results: Using a neutral, pessimistic, or optimistic prior, the posterior mean odds ratio (OR) for High PEEP with recruitment maneuvers compared to Low PEEP was 0.85 (95% Credible Interval [CrI] 0.71 to 1.02), 0.87 (0.72 to 1.04), and 0.86 (0.71 to 1.02), respectively. Regardless of prior beliefs, the posterior probability of experiencing a beneficial effect exceeded 90%. Subgroup analysis indicated a more pronounced effect in patients who underwent laparoscopy (OR: 0.67 [0.50 to 0.87]) and those at high risk for PPCs (OR: 0.80 [0.53 to 1.13]). Sensitivity analysis, considering severe postoperative pulmonary complications only or applying a different heterogeneity prior, yielded consistent results. Conclusion: High PEEP with recruitment maneuvers demonstrated a moderate reduction in the probability of PPC occurrence, with a high posterior probability of benefit observed consistently across various prior beliefs, particularly among patients who underwent laparoscopy.
dc.identifier.citationAnesthesiology (2024)
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/ALN.0000000000005170
dc.identifier.eissn15281175
dc.identifier.issn00033022
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85200469186
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/100464
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleHigh PEEP with recruitment maneuvers versus Low PEEP During General Anesthesia for Surgery -a Bayesian individual patient data meta-analysis of three randomized clinical trials
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85200469186&origin=inward
oaire.citation.titleAnesthesiology
oairecerif.author.affiliationInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Fundación Para la Investigación del Hospital Clínico de Valencia - INCLIVA
oairecerif.author.affiliationNavarrabiomed
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden
oairecerif.author.affiliationMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit
oairecerif.author.affiliationMelbourne Medical School
oairecerif.author.affiliationIRCCS San Martino Polyclinic Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe
oairecerif.author.affiliationCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias
oairecerif.author.affiliationGeneral Hospital St. Jan
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversità degli studi Magna Graecia di Catanzaro
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitair Ziekenhuis Gent
oairecerif.author.affiliationHospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe
oairecerif.author.affiliationJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitätsklinikum Bonn
oairecerif.author.affiliationHospital Clínic de Barcelona
oairecerif.author.affiliationMassachusetts General Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationPontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
oairecerif.author.affiliationHospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol
oairecerif.author.affiliationHôpital Saint Eloi
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversità degli Studi di Udine
oairecerif.author.affiliationHeinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversità degli Studi di Genova
oairecerif.author.affiliationSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversità degli Studi di Foggia
oairecerif.author.affiliationCleveland Clinic Foundation
oairecerif.author.affiliationMonash University
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity of Alberta, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversità degli Studi di Palermo
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversità degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
oairecerif.author.affiliationHospital Israelita Albert Einstein
oairecerif.author.affiliationFundacio Puigvert
oairecerif.author.affiliationHospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia
oairecerif.author.affiliationMedizinische Universität Wien
oairecerif.author.affiliationHospital de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau
oairecerif.author.affiliationZiekenhuisNetwerk Antwerpen
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversidade de São Paulo
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversität Leipzig
oairecerif.author.affiliationMayo Clinic
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversità degli Studi dell'Insubria
oairecerif.author.affiliationUppsala Universitet
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitat de València
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversiteit van Amsterdam
oairecerif.author.affiliationAmsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdam
oairecerif.author.affiliationAzienda Sanitaria Locale TO3 - Ospedale di Rivoli
oairecerif.author.affiliationPROtective VEntilation Network
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity Hospital Sveti Duh
oairecerif.author.affiliationHospital de Manises
oairecerif.author.affiliationVirga Jesse Ziekenhuis
oairecerif.author.affiliationLaboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology (L·E·I·C·A)
oairecerif.author.affiliationGeneral Universitario

Files

Collections