Publication: Utilisation review of clopidogrel: Are they used under the FDA-approved indications?
Issued Date
2007-09-01
Resource Type
ISSN
10991557
10538569
10538569
DOI
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-34548709759
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety. Vol.16, No.9 (2007), 1031-1037
Suggested Citation
Surachet Niruntraporn, Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk, Surakit Nathisuwan, Visanu Thamlikitkul Utilisation review of clopidogrel: Are they used under the FDA-approved indications?. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety. Vol.16, No.9 (2007), 1031-1037. doi:10.1002/pds.1429 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/24770
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Utilisation review of clopidogrel: Are they used under the FDA-approved indications?
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Background: Clopidogrel has shown benefit in patients with increased risk of cardiovascular diseases. Due to its high acquisition cost and its increased use, this study was conducted to review the use of clopidogrel based on the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved indications and the ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Method: This was a cross-sectional study conducted at a tertiary-care, university-affiliated hospital in the Northern part of Thailand. Medical records of patients receiving clopidogrel during January 2005 to February 2006 were reviewed. Baseline characteristics of patients along with specific information regarding the use of clopidogrel were collected. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Result: A total of 191 patients were included in this utilisation review (95 and 96 were inpatient and outpatient, respectively). The use of clopidogrel was deemed appropriate in 82.7% of cases including 72.2% for FDA-approved indications and 10.5% for STEMI. Clopidogrel/aspirin combination was indicated in 93 patients; however, 22 patients received clopidogrel monotherapy. On the contrary, 10 patients received clopidogrel/aspirin combination when only clopidogrel monotherapy was indicated. Moreover, 60% of patients who received clopidogrel monotherapy had no history of aspirin intolerance or recurrent events while on aspirin therapy. Conclusion: The results showed that the majority of clopidogrel use was deemed appropriate based on FDA-approved indications and for medically justified indication. However, a significant number of patients received clopidogrel instead of aspirin while no aspirin intolerance was documented. Therefore, efforts should be made to promote the appropriate use of this agent to improve patient outcomes. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.