Publication:
Utilisation review of clopidogrel: Are they used under the FDA-approved indications?

dc.contributor.authorSurachet Niruntrapornen_US
dc.contributor.authorNathorn Chaiyakunapruken_US
dc.contributor.authorSurakit Nathisuwanen_US
dc.contributor.authorVisanu Thamlikitkulen_US
dc.contributor.otherNaresuan Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-24T02:01:39Z
dc.date.available2018-08-24T02:01:39Z
dc.date.issued2007-09-01en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Clopidogrel has shown benefit in patients with increased risk of cardiovascular diseases. Due to its high acquisition cost and its increased use, this study was conducted to review the use of clopidogrel based on the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved indications and the ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Method: This was a cross-sectional study conducted at a tertiary-care, university-affiliated hospital in the Northern part of Thailand. Medical records of patients receiving clopidogrel during January 2005 to February 2006 were reviewed. Baseline characteristics of patients along with specific information regarding the use of clopidogrel were collected. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Result: A total of 191 patients were included in this utilisation review (95 and 96 were inpatient and outpatient, respectively). The use of clopidogrel was deemed appropriate in 82.7% of cases including 72.2% for FDA-approved indications and 10.5% for STEMI. Clopidogrel/aspirin combination was indicated in 93 patients; however, 22 patients received clopidogrel monotherapy. On the contrary, 10 patients received clopidogrel/aspirin combination when only clopidogrel monotherapy was indicated. Moreover, 60% of patients who received clopidogrel monotherapy had no history of aspirin intolerance or recurrent events while on aspirin therapy. Conclusion: The results showed that the majority of clopidogrel use was deemed appropriate based on FDA-approved indications and for medically justified indication. However, a significant number of patients received clopidogrel instead of aspirin while no aspirin intolerance was documented. Therefore, efforts should be made to promote the appropriate use of this agent to improve patient outcomes. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en_US
dc.identifier.citationPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety. Vol.16, No.9 (2007), 1031-1037en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/pds.1429en_US
dc.identifier.issn10991557en_US
dc.identifier.issn10538569en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-34548709759en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/24770
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=34548709759&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleUtilisation review of clopidogrel: Are they used under the FDA-approved indications?en_US
dc.typeReviewen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=34548709759&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections