Publication: Comparison of corneal astigmatism measurements of 2 optical biometer models for toric intraocular lens selection
1
item.page.dc.date.issued
2015-01-01
item.page.dc.type
item.page.dc.identifier.issn
18734502
08863350
08863350
item.page.dc.identifier.doi
item.page.dc.identifier.other
2-s2.0-84923095888
item.page.dc.rights
Mahidol University
item.page.dc.rights.holder
SCOPUS
item.page.dc.identifier.citation
Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. Vol.41, No.2 (2015), 364-371
punsarn.item.page.citation
Sabong Srivannaboon, Chareenun Chirapapaisan, Pratuangsri Chonpimai, Sunisa Koodkaew Comparison of corneal astigmatism measurements of 2 optical biometer models for toric intraocular lens selection. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. Vol.41, No.2 (2015), 364-371. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.06.029 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/36757
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
relationships.isThesisOf
item.page.dc.title
Comparison of corneal astigmatism measurements of 2 optical biometer models for toric intraocular lens selection
item.page.dc.contributor.author
item.page.dc.contributor.other
item.page.dc.description.abstract
© 2015 ASCRS and ESCRS. Purpose To compare corneal astigmatism measurements obtained using a new optical biometer (AL-Scan) and a standard biometer based on partial coherence interferometry (IOLMaster 500) for toric intraocular lens (IOL) selection. Setting Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. Design Prospective comparative study. Methods Keratometry (K) readings were taken with the 2 biometers in eyes of cataract patients. The corneal astigmatism readings from the 2 devices were compared. The cylinder measurements were transformed into J0 and J45 vector components for analysis, and the devices' values were compared using the paired t test. Correlation coefficients were calculated. The Bland-Altman method was used to evaluate the agreement between the sets of measurements. Results One hundred thirty-seven eyes (81 patients) were enrolled. The magnitude of astigmatism between the new biometer 2.4 mm zone and the standard biometer was similar (P =.19). There was a statistically significant difference between values from the new biometer 3.3 mm zone and the standard biometer (P <.05). There was good correlation in the overall magnitude of astigmatism between devices. There was a trend of low correlation toward the flat cornea (K <43.0 diopters [D]), low corneal cylinder (<1.0 D), and with-the-rule astigmatism. The IOL toricity calculated from both devices was similar. Conclusions Corneal astigmatism measurements with the 2 biometers were similar in magnitude, especially in 2.4 mm zone of the new biometer. There was no difference in the toric IOL selections between the devices. Financial Disclosure No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.