Publication:
Toxoplasma gondii infection: What is the real situation?

dc.contributor.authorWaenurama Chemohen_US
dc.contributor.authorNongyao Sawangjaroenen_US
dc.contributor.authorVeeranoot Nissapatornen_US
dc.contributor.authorChitkasaem Suwanrathen_US
dc.contributor.authorVerapol Chandeyingen_US
dc.contributor.authorThanaporn Hortiwakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorHemah Andiappanen_US
dc.contributor.authorNatthawan Sermwittayawongen_US
dc.contributor.authorBunsri Charoenmaken_US
dc.contributor.authorPisut Siripaitoonen_US
dc.contributor.authorAmorn Lekklaen_US
dc.contributor.authorYaowalark Sukthanaen_US
dc.contributor.otherPrince of Songkla Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Malayaen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Thammasat Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-19T04:59:39Z
dc.date.available2018-10-19T04:59:39Z
dc.date.issued2013-12-01en_US
dc.description.abstractThe prevalence of chronic Toxoplasma infections reported in the literature varies enormously. We hypothesize that one factor could be due to the different methods used in the evaluation of infections. Serological evidence of Toxoplasma infections in 450 pregnant women (PW) and 300 HIV-infected patients (HIV) were investigated by the Sabin-Feldman dye test and two other commercial ELISA kits (kit1 and kit2). Anti Toxoplasma IgG antibodies obtained from the Sabin-Feldman dye test, ELISA kit1 and ELISA kit2 in the PW subjects were 14.7%, 29.6% and 38.7%, and in the HIV subjects were 13%, 34.7% and 36.3%, respectively. So there were significant differences in the seroprevalences when different diagnostic tests were used (P<. 0.05). Regarding Sabin-Feldman dye test as the gold standard for anti Toxoplasma antibodies detection, we found that the sensitivity and specificity of the ELISA kit1 and kit2 was in the range of their specification. However as the two ELISA kits used in our study identified a much higher prevalence of Toxoplasma infections which indicated that false positive cases were being reported. Based on results obtained, it is therefore highly recommended that research workers should be aware that the reports of serological studies in terms of high positive results should be treated with some skepticism until additional precise diagnostic tools are developed. © 2013 Elsevier Inc.en_US
dc.identifier.citationExperimental Parasitology. Vol.135, No.4 (2013), 685-689en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.exppara.2013.10.001en_US
dc.identifier.issn10902449en_US
dc.identifier.issn00144894en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84887524600en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/31823
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84887524600&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiologyen_US
dc.titleToxoplasma gondii infection: What is the real situation?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84887524600&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections