Publication: Athlete, coach and practitioner knowledge and perceptions of post-exercise cold-water immersion for recovery: a qualitative and quantitative exploration
Issued Date
2021-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
18251234
18247490
18247490
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85117112012
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Sport Sciences for Health. (2021)
Suggested Citation
Robert Allan, Benjamin Akin, Jonathan Sinclair, Howard Hurst, Jill Alexander, James J. Malone, Adam Naylor, Chris Mawhinney, Warren Gregson, Mohammed Ihsan Athlete, coach and practitioner knowledge and perceptions of post-exercise cold-water immersion for recovery: a qualitative and quantitative exploration. Sport Sciences for Health. (2021). doi:10.1007/s11332-021-00839-3 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/78588
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Athlete, coach and practitioner knowledge and perceptions of post-exercise cold-water immersion for recovery: a qualitative and quantitative exploration
Abstract
This survey sought to establish current use, knowledge and perceptions of cold-water immersion (CWI) when used for recovery. 111 athletes, coaches and support practitioners completed the anonymous online survey, answering questions about their current CWI protocols, perceptions of benefits associated with CWI and knowledge of controlling mechanisms. Respondents were largely involved in elite sport at international, national and club level, with many having used CWI previously (86%) and finding its use beneficial for recovery (78%). Protocols differed, with the duration of immersion one aspect that failed to align with recommendations in the scientific literature. Whilst many respondents were aware of benefits associated with CWI, there remains some confusion. There also seems to be a gap in mechanistic knowledge, where respondents are aware of benefits associated with CWI, but failed to identify the underlying mechanisms. This identifies the need for an improved method of knowledge transfer between scientific and applied practice communities. Moreover, data herein emphasises the important role of the ‘support practitioner’ as respondents in this role tended to favour CWI protocols more aligned to recommendations within the literature. With a significant number of respondents claiming they were made aware of CWI for recovery through a colleague (43%), the importance of knowledge transfer and context being appropriately applied to data is as important as ever. With the firm belief that CWI is useful for recovery in sport, the focus should now be on investigating the psychophysiological interaction and correct use of this methodology.