Publication:
Athlete, coach and practitioner knowledge and perceptions of post-exercise cold-water immersion for recovery: a qualitative and quantitative exploration

dc.contributor.authorRobert Allanen_US
dc.contributor.authorBenjamin Akinen_US
dc.contributor.authorJonathan Sinclairen_US
dc.contributor.authorHoward Hursten_US
dc.contributor.authorJill Alexanderen_US
dc.contributor.authorJames J. Maloneen_US
dc.contributor.authorAdam Nayloren_US
dc.contributor.authorChris Mawhinneyen_US
dc.contributor.authorWarren Gregsonen_US
dc.contributor.authorMohammed Ihsanen_US
dc.contributor.otherLiverpool Hope Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Central Lancashireen_US
dc.contributor.otherLiverpool John Moores Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherNUS Yong Loo Lin School of Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Boltonen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T11:05:33Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T11:05:33Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstractThis survey sought to establish current use, knowledge and perceptions of cold-water immersion (CWI) when used for recovery. 111 athletes, coaches and support practitioners completed the anonymous online survey, answering questions about their current CWI protocols, perceptions of benefits associated with CWI and knowledge of controlling mechanisms. Respondents were largely involved in elite sport at international, national and club level, with many having used CWI previously (86%) and finding its use beneficial for recovery (78%). Protocols differed, with the duration of immersion one aspect that failed to align with recommendations in the scientific literature. Whilst many respondents were aware of benefits associated with CWI, there remains some confusion. There also seems to be a gap in mechanistic knowledge, where respondents are aware of benefits associated with CWI, but failed to identify the underlying mechanisms. This identifies the need for an improved method of knowledge transfer between scientific and applied practice communities. Moreover, data herein emphasises the important role of the ‘support practitioner’ as respondents in this role tended to favour CWI protocols more aligned to recommendations within the literature. With a significant number of respondents claiming they were made aware of CWI for recovery through a colleague (43%), the importance of knowledge transfer and context being appropriately applied to data is as important as ever. With the firm belief that CWI is useful for recovery in sport, the focus should now be on investigating the psychophysiological interaction and correct use of this methodology.en_US
dc.identifier.citationSport Sciences for Health. (2021)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11332-021-00839-3en_US
dc.identifier.issn18251234en_US
dc.identifier.issn18247490en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85117112012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/78588
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85117112012&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleAthlete, coach and practitioner knowledge and perceptions of post-exercise cold-water immersion for recovery: a qualitative and quantitative explorationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85117112012&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections