Publication:
Review of the evidence regarding the use of antenatal multiple micronutrient supplementation in low- and middle-income countries

dc.contributor.authorMegan W. Bourassaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSaskia J.M. Osendarpen_US
dc.contributor.authorSeth Adu-Afarwuahen_US
dc.contributor.authorSaima Ahmeden_US
dc.contributor.authorClayton Ajelloen_US
dc.contributor.authorGilles Bergeronen_US
dc.contributor.authorRobert Blacken_US
dc.contributor.authorParul Christianen_US
dc.contributor.authorSimon Cousensen_US
dc.contributor.authorSaskia de Peeen_US
dc.contributor.authorKathryn G. Deweyen_US
dc.contributor.authorShams El Arifeenen_US
dc.contributor.authorReina Engle-Stoneen_US
dc.contributor.authorAlison Fleeten_US
dc.contributor.authorAlison D. Gernanden_US
dc.contributor.authorJohn Hoddinotten_US
dc.contributor.authorRolf Klemmen_US
dc.contributor.authorKlaus Kraemeren_US
dc.contributor.authorRoland Kupkaen_US
dc.contributor.authorErin McLeanen_US
dc.contributor.authorSophie E. Mooreen_US
dc.contributor.authorLynnette M. Neufelden_US
dc.contributor.authorLars Åke Perssonen_US
dc.contributor.authorKathleen M. Rasmussenen_US
dc.contributor.authorAnuraj H. Shankaren_US
dc.contributor.authorEmily Smithen_US
dc.contributor.authorChristopher R. Sudfelden_US
dc.contributor.authorEmorn Udomkesmaleeen_US
dc.contributor.authorStephen A. Vostien_US
dc.contributor.otherGlobal Alliance for Improved Nutritionen_US
dc.contributor.otherWorld Food Program, Italyen_US
dc.contributor.otherHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Healthen_US
dc.contributor.otherLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherNew York Academy of Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.otherTufts Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherBill and Melinda Gates Foundationen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Ghanaen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of California, Davisen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherKing's College Londonen_US
dc.contributor.otherInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladeshen_US
dc.contributor.otherUNICEFen_US
dc.contributor.otherCornell Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Healthen_US
dc.contributor.otherWageningen University and Research Centreen_US
dc.contributor.otherPennsylvania State Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherThe Vitamin Angels Alliance, Inc.en_US
dc.contributor.otherHelen Keller Internationalen_US
dc.contributor.otherLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherOsendarp Nutritionen_US
dc.contributor.otherSummit Institute of Developmenten_US
dc.contributor.otherSight and Lifeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T07:32:18Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T07:32:18Z
dc.date.issued2019-05-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2019 The Authors. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of New York Academy of Sciences. Inadequate micronutrient intakes are relatively common in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), especially among pregnant women, who have increased micronutrient requirements. This can lead to an increase in adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes. This review presents the conclusions of a task force that set out to assess the prevalence of inadequate micronutrient intakes and adverse birth outcomes in LMICs; the data from trials comparing multiple micronutrient supplements (MMS) that contain iron and folic acid (IFA) with IFA supplements alone; the risks of reaching the upper intake levels with MMS; and the cost-effectiveness of MMS compared with IFA. Recent meta-analyses demonstrate that MMS can reduce the risks of preterm birth, low birth weight, and small for gestational age in comparison with IFA alone. An individual-participant data meta-analysis also revealed even greater benefits for anemic and underweight women and female infants. Importantly, there was no increased risk of harm for the pregnant women or their infants with MMS. These data suggest that countries with inadequate micronutrient intakes should consider supplementing pregnant women with MMS as a cost-effective method to reduce the risk of adverse birth outcomes.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences. Vol.1444, No.1 (2019), 6-21en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/nyas.14121en_US
dc.identifier.issn17496632en_US
dc.identifier.issn00778923en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85066409444en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/49950
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85066409444&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectArts and Humanitiesen_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.titleReview of the evidence regarding the use of antenatal multiple micronutrient supplementation in low- and middle-income countriesen_US
dc.typeReviewen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85066409444&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections