Publication:
Patterns of Lumbar Disc Degeneration: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis in Symptomatic Subjects

dc.contributor.authorMonchai Ruangchainikomen_US
dc.contributor.authorMichael D. Daubsen_US
dc.contributor.authorAkinobu Suzukien_US
dc.contributor.authorChengjie Xiongen_US
dc.contributor.authorTetsuo Hayashien_US
dc.contributor.authorTrevor P. Scotten_US
dc.contributor.authorKevin Phanen_US
dc.contributor.authorJeffrey C. Wangen_US
dc.contributor.otherOsaka Metropolitan Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherSiriraj Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherSpinal Injuries Centeren_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Southern Californiaen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of California, Los Angelesen_US
dc.contributor.otherMontefiore Medical Centeren_US
dc.contributor.otherUNLV School of Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherGeneral Hospital of Central Theater Command of People's Liberation Armyen_US
dc.contributor.otherProliance Orthopaedics and Sports Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T11:03:30Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T11:03:30Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstractStudy Design: Cross-sectional study.Purpose: To evaluate lumbar disc degeneration (LDD) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in symptomatic subjects to accumulate baseline data on the pattern of degeneration.Overview of Literature: LDD plays an important role in the diagnosis and treatment of low-back pain in patients. Few studies have focused on the pattern of LDD to understand how the lumbar spine ages.Methods: This study included 1,095 patients (mean age, 44.29 years; range, 16–85 years) who underwent upright lumbar MRI. LDD was graded into five categories (I–V). Positive LDD was defined as grade III or greater. The prevalence and pattern of LDD were ana-lyzed, and the correlations between age and total grade of LDD were evaluated.Results: The average number of LDD levels and the total grade of LDD increased with age. LDD moved cephalad with age. The rate of LDD increased rapidly during the decade before the prevalence of LDD and became >50%. In the single-level LDD group, the levels L5–S1 were the most common levels (60.3%). In the two-level group, L4–L5 and L5–S1 were the most common levels (53.5%). In the three-level group, L3–L4, L4–L5, and L5–S1 were the most common levels (55.7%). In the multilevel LDD group, contiguous multilevel disc degeneration (CMDD) was more common than the skipped level disc degeneration (SLDD). The levels L4–L5 were the most com-mon levels in the CMDD group, and L5–S1 were the most common levels among SLDD.Conclusions: LDD was found to correlate with age, and the specific patterns and rates of LDD depended on lumbar disc level and age. These LDD pattern data can be used before spinal procedures to predict the probability of natural LDD progression with age.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAsian Spine Journal. Vol.15, No.6 (2021), 799-807en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.31616/ASJ.2020.0325en_US
dc.identifier.issn19767846en_US
dc.identifier.issn19761902en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85123081703en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/78525
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85123081703&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titlePatterns of Lumbar Disc Degeneration: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis in Symptomatic Subjectsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85123081703&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections