Publication: Clinical evaluation of class II high-viscosity glass ionomer cement and composite resin restorations in primary molars: one year result.
Accepted Date
2014-02-28
Issued Date
2014-05
Resource Type
Language
eng
ISSN
0125-5614 (printed)
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
Faculty of Dentistry Mahidol University
Bibliographic Citation
Phonghanyudh A, Theerareungchaisri C, Jirarattanasopa V. Clinical evaluation of class II high-viscosity glass ionomer cement and composite resin restorations in primary molars: one year result. M Dent J. 2014; 34(2): 129-36.
Suggested Citation
Araya Phonghanyudh, อารยา พงษ์หาญยุทธ, Chutima Theerareungchaisri, ชุติมา ธีระเรืองไชยศรี, Varangkana Jirarattanasopa, วรางคณา จิรรัตนโสภา Clinical evaluation of class II high-viscosity glass ionomer cement and composite resin restorations in primary molars: one year result.. Phonghanyudh A, Theerareungchaisri C, Jirarattanasopa V. Clinical evaluation of class II high-viscosity glass ionomer cement and composite resin restorations in primary molars: one year result. M Dent J. 2014; 34(2): 129-36.. Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/1153
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Clinical evaluation of class II high-viscosity glass ionomer cement and composite resin restorations in primary molars: one year result.
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the clinical and radiographic performances of highly
viscous glass ionomer cement (GIC) and composite resin (CR) class II
restorations in primary molars at 12-month follow-up.
Materials and methods: Fifty-five pairs of primary molars with proximal
dentin carious lesions in 37 children, aged 6-9 years, were studied. A
split-mouth technique was designed. The teeth were randomly divided into 2
groups of restorative materials: highly viscous GIC ( Fuji IX GP:GC Co., Tokyo,
Japan) and CR ( Filtek Z250:3M ESPE, St. Paul, U.S.A.). The restorations were
evaluated clinically at 6 and 12 months following modified USPHS criteria.
Bitewing radiographs were assessed at 12-month follow-up. All parameters of
clinical and radiographic performances between the two groups were tested
by Wilcoxon matched-pair signed-rank test.
Results: The cumulative failure rates of GIC and CR restorations at 12-month
follow-up were 2.08% and 4.41% respectively. There was no statistically
significant difference in the failure rate of both materials. There were no
statistically significant differences in the clinical and radiographic performances
between the two groups. All parameters both clinical and radiographical were
similar between GIC and CR restorations.
Conclusion: Highly viscous glass ionomer cement and composite resin were
highly effective materials for class II restoration in primary molars from 12-
month results.