Publication:
Clinical evaluation of class II high-viscosity glass ionomer cement and composite resin restorations in primary molars: one year result.

dc.contributor.authorAraya Phonghanyudhen_US
dc.contributor.authorอารยา พงษ์หาญยุทธen_US
dc.contributor.authorChutima Theerareungchaisrien_US
dc.contributor.authorชุติมา ธีระเรืองไชยศรีen_US
dc.contributor.authorVarangkana Jirarattanasopaen_US
dc.contributor.authorวรางคณา จิรรัตนโสภาen_US
dc.contributor.correspondenceAraya Phonghanyudhen_US
dc.contributor.correspondenceอารยา พงษ์หาญยุทธen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University. Faculty of Dentistry. Department of Pediatric Dentistryen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-27T10:23:20Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-10T01:57:37Z
dc.date.available2015-01-27T10:23:20Z
dc.date.available2017-01-10T01:57:37Z
dc.date.created2015-01-06
dc.date.issued2014-05
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate the clinical and radiographic performances of highly viscous glass ionomer cement (GIC) and composite resin (CR) class II restorations in primary molars at 12-month follow-up. Materials and methods: Fifty-five pairs of primary molars with proximal dentin carious lesions in 37 children, aged 6-9 years, were studied. A split-mouth technique was designed. The teeth were randomly divided into 2 groups of restorative materials: highly viscous GIC ( Fuji IX GP:GC Co., Tokyo, Japan) and CR ( Filtek Z250:3M ESPE, St. Paul, U.S.A.). The restorations were evaluated clinically at 6 and 12 months following modified USPHS criteria. Bitewing radiographs were assessed at 12-month follow-up. All parameters of clinical and radiographic performances between the two groups were tested by Wilcoxon matched-pair signed-rank test. Results: The cumulative failure rates of GIC and CR restorations at 12-month follow-up were 2.08% and 4.41% respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the failure rate of both materials. There were no statistically significant differences in the clinical and radiographic performances between the two groups. All parameters both clinical and radiographical were similar between GIC and CR restorations. Conclusion: Highly viscous glass ionomer cement and composite resin were highly effective materials for class II restoration in primary molars from 12- month results.en_US
dc.identifier.citationPhonghanyudh A, Theerareungchaisri C, Jirarattanasopa V. Clinical evaluation of class II high-viscosity glass ionomer cement and composite resin restorations in primary molars: one year result. M Dent J. 2014; 34(2): 129-36.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0125-5614 (printed)
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/1153
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderFaculty of Dentistry Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.subjectClass II restorationen_US
dc.subjectGlass ionomer cementen_US
dc.subjectComposite resinen_US
dc.subjectPrimary molaren_US
dc.subjectCumulative failureen_US
dc.subjectClinical evaluationen_US
dc.subjectOpen Access articleen_US
dc.subjectวิทยาสารทันตแพทยศาสตร์มหิดล
dc.subjectMahidol Dental Journal
dc.titleClinical evaluation of class II high-viscosity glass ionomer cement and composite resin restorations in primary molars: one year result.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2014-02-28
dspace.entity.typePublication
mods.location.urlhttp://www.dt.mahidol.ac.th/division/offeducation/education_1_6/wittayasarn/2-57/%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B7%E0%B9%88%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%97%E0%B8%B5%E0%B9%88%204.pdf

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
dt-ar-araya-2014.pdf
Size:
243.78 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:

Collections