Publication: Spirituality as a scientific construct: Testing its universality across cultures and languages
Submitted Date
Received Date
Accepted Date
Issued Date
2015-03-03
Copyright Date
Announcement No.
Application No.
Patent No.
Valid Date
Resource Type
Edition
Resource Version
Language
File Type
No. of Pages/File Size
ISBN
ISSN
19326203
eISSN
Scopus ID
WOS ID
Pubmed ID
arXiv ID
Call No.
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-84923862770
Journal Title
Volume
Issue
item.page.oaire.edition
Start Page
End Page
Access Rights
Access Status
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Physical Location
Bibliographic Citation
PLoS ONE. Vol.10, No.3 (2015)
Citation
Douglas A. MacDonald, Harris L. Friedman, Jacek Brewczynski, Daniel Holland, Kiran Kumar K. Salagame, K. Krishna Mohan, Zuzana Ondriasova Gubrij, Hye Wook Cheong (2015). Spirituality as a scientific construct: Testing its universality across cultures and languages. Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/35196.
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Spirituality as a scientific construct: Testing its universality across cultures and languages
Alternative Title(s)
Author's Affiliation
Author's E-mail
Editor(s)
Editor's Affiliation
Corresponding Author(s)
Creator(s)
Compiler
Advisor(s)
Illustrator(s)
Applicant(s)
Inventor(s)
Issuer
Assignee
Series
Has Part
Abstract
© 2015, Public Library of Science. All rights reserved. Using data obtained from 4004 participants across eight countries (Canada, India, Japan, Korea, Poland, Slovakia, Uganda, and the U.S.), the factorial reliability, validity and structural/measurement invariance of a 30-item version of Expressions of Spirituality Inventory (ESI-R) was evaluated. The ESI-R measures a five factor model of spirituality developed through the conjoint factor analysis of several extant measures of spiritual constructs. Exploratory factor analyses of pooled data provided evidence that the five ESI-R factors are reliable. Confirmatory analyses comparing four and five factor models revealed that the five dimensional model demonstrates superior goodness-of-fit with all cultural samples and suggest that the ESI-R may be viewed as structurally invariant. Measurement invariance, however, was not supported as manifested in significant differences in item and dimension scores and in significantly poorer fit when factor loadings were constrained to equality across all samples. Exploratory analyses with a second adjective measure of spirituality using American, Indian, and Ugandan samples identified three replicable factors which correlated with ESI-R dimensions in a manner supportive of convergent validity. The paper concludes with a discussion of the meaning of the findings and directions needed for future research.