Publication:
Spirituality as a scientific construct: Testing its universality across cultures and languages

dc.contributor.authorDouglas A. MacDonalden_US
dc.contributor.authorHarris L. Friedmanen_US
dc.contributor.authorJacek Brewczynskien_US
dc.contributor.authorDaniel Hollanden_US
dc.contributor.authorKiran Kumar K. Salagameen_US
dc.contributor.authorK. Krishna Mohanen_US
dc.contributor.authorZuzana Ondriasova Gubrijen_US
dc.contributor.authorHye Wook Cheongen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Detroit Mercyen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Floridaen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Utahen_US
dc.contributor.otherThe Neurobehavior Center of Minnesotaen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Mysoreen_US
dc.contributor.otherMakerere Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.otherDongWoo Fine-Chem Co., Ltd.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-23T09:32:10Z
dc.date.available2018-11-23T09:32:10Z
dc.date.issued2015-03-03en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2015, Public Library of Science. All rights reserved. Using data obtained from 4004 participants across eight countries (Canada, India, Japan, Korea, Poland, Slovakia, Uganda, and the U.S.), the factorial reliability, validity and structural/measurement invariance of a 30-item version of Expressions of Spirituality Inventory (ESI-R) was evaluated. The ESI-R measures a five factor model of spirituality developed through the conjoint factor analysis of several extant measures of spiritual constructs. Exploratory factor analyses of pooled data provided evidence that the five ESI-R factors are reliable. Confirmatory analyses comparing four and five factor models revealed that the five dimensional model demonstrates superior goodness-of-fit with all cultural samples and suggest that the ESI-R may be viewed as structurally invariant. Measurement invariance, however, was not supported as manifested in significant differences in item and dimension scores and in significantly poorer fit when factor loadings were constrained to equality across all samples. Exploratory analyses with a second adjective measure of spirituality using American, Indian, and Ugandan samples identified three replicable factors which correlated with ESI-R dimensions in a manner supportive of convergent validity. The paper concludes with a discussion of the meaning of the findings and directions needed for future research.en_US
dc.identifier.citationPLoS ONE. Vol.10, No.3 (2015)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0117701en_US
dc.identifier.issn19326203en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84923862770en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/35196
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84923862770&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.titleSpirituality as a scientific construct: Testing its universality across cultures and languagesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84923862770&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections