Publication: The use of a human’s location and social cues by Asian elephants in an object-choice task
Issued Date
2019-11-01
Resource Type
ISSN
14359456
14359448
14359448
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85067702207
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Animal Cognition. Vol.22, No.6 (2019), 907-915
Suggested Citation
Oraya Ketchaisri, Chomcheun Siripunkaw, Joshua M. Plotnik The use of a human’s location and social cues by Asian elephants in an object-choice task. Animal Cognition. Vol.22, No.6 (2019), 907-915. doi:10.1007/s10071-019-01283-0 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/49711
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
The use of a human’s location and social cues by Asian elephants in an object-choice task
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
© 2019, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature. Asian elephants have previously demonstrated an ability to follow olfactory cues, but not human-provided social cues like pointing and gazing or orienting to find hidden food (Plotnik et al. in PLoS One 8:e61174, 2013; Anim Behav 88:91–98, 2014). In a study conducted with African elephants, however, elephants were able to follow a combination of these social cues to find food, even when the experimenter’s position was counter to the location of the food. The authors of the latter study argued that the differences in the two species’ performances might have been due to methodological differences in the study designs (Smet and Byrne in Curr Biol 23(20):2033–2037, 2013). To further investigate the reasons for these potential differences, we partially adapted Smet and Byrne (2013)’s design for a group of Asian elephants in Thailand. In a two-object-choice task in which only one of two buckets was baited with food, we found that, as a group, the elephants did not follow cues provided by an experimenter when she was positioned either equidistant between the buckets or closer to the incorrect bucket when providing the cues. The elephants did, however, follow cues when the experimenter was closer to the correct bucket. In addition, there was individual variability in the elephants’ performance within and across experimental conditions. This indicates that in general, for Asian elephants, the pointing and/or gazing cues alone may not be salient enough; local enhancement in the form of the experimenter’s position in relation to the food reward may represent a crucial, complementary cue. These results suggest that the variability within and between the species in their performance on these tasks could be due to a number of factors, including methodology, the elephants’ experiences with their handlers, ecological differences in how Asian and African elephants use non-visual sensory information to find food in the wild, or some combination of the three.