Publication:
The use of a human’s location and social cues by Asian elephants in an object-choice task

dc.contributor.authorOraya Ketchaisrien_US
dc.contributor.authorChomcheun Siripunkawen_US
dc.contributor.authorJoshua M. Plotniken_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherHunter Collegeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T07:20:56Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T07:20:56Z
dc.date.issued2019-11-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2019, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature. Asian elephants have previously demonstrated an ability to follow olfactory cues, but not human-provided social cues like pointing and gazing or orienting to find hidden food (Plotnik et al. in PLoS One 8:e61174, 2013; Anim Behav 88:91–98, 2014). In a study conducted with African elephants, however, elephants were able to follow a combination of these social cues to find food, even when the experimenter’s position was counter to the location of the food. The authors of the latter study argued that the differences in the two species’ performances might have been due to methodological differences in the study designs (Smet and Byrne in Curr Biol 23(20):2033–2037, 2013). To further investigate the reasons for these potential differences, we partially adapted Smet and Byrne (2013)’s design for a group of Asian elephants in Thailand. In a two-object-choice task in which only one of two buckets was baited with food, we found that, as a group, the elephants did not follow cues provided by an experimenter when she was positioned either equidistant between the buckets or closer to the incorrect bucket when providing the cues. The elephants did, however, follow cues when the experimenter was closer to the correct bucket. In addition, there was individual variability in the elephants’ performance within and across experimental conditions. This indicates that in general, for Asian elephants, the pointing and/or gazing cues alone may not be salient enough; local enhancement in the form of the experimenter’s position in relation to the food reward may represent a crucial, complementary cue. These results suggest that the variability within and between the species in their performance on these tasks could be due to a number of factors, including methodology, the elephants’ experiences with their handlers, ecological differences in how Asian and African elephants use non-visual sensory information to find food in the wild, or some combination of the three.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAnimal Cognition. Vol.22, No.6 (2019), 907-915en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10071-019-01283-0en_US
dc.identifier.issn14359456en_US
dc.identifier.issn14359448en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85067702207en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/49711
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85067702207&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.titleThe use of a human’s location and social cues by Asian elephants in an object-choice tasken_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85067702207&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections