Publication: Comparisons of complications between extended latissimus dorsi flap and latissimus dorsi flap in total breast reconstruction: A prospective cohort study
2
Issued Date
2020-08-01
Resource Type
ISSN
20490801
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85087212682
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Annals of Medicine and Surgery. Vol.56, (2020), 197-202
Suggested Citation
Prakasit Chirappapha, Panya Thaweepworadej, Kasamar Chitmetha, Chayanoot Rattadilok, Teerawut Rakchob, Thitipat Wattanakul, Panuwat Lertsithichai, Monchai Leesombatpaiboon, Nopawan Sanjaroensutikul Comparisons of complications between extended latissimus dorsi flap and latissimus dorsi flap in total breast reconstruction: A prospective cohort study. Annals of Medicine and Surgery. Vol.56, (2020), 197-202. doi:10.1016/j.amsu.2020.05.046 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/58040
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Comparisons of complications between extended latissimus dorsi flap and latissimus dorsi flap in total breast reconstruction: A prospective cohort study
Abstract
© 2020 The Authors Background: The latissimus dorsi (LD) flap is one of the most popular techniques in breast reconstruction. Although numerous studies have not shown functional impairment of the shoulder after surgery, other studies have reported significant functional impairment, especially after extended LD flap reconstruction. The present study compared functional deficit and shoulder movement between extended LD and LD flap reconstruction. Materials and methods: Between December 2015 and May 2018, this study enrolled 31 patients undergoing LD flap reconstruction. Data on patient demographics, operative details, morbidities, and degree of shoulder movement were collected. Outcomes were compared between the extended LD and LD flap groups. Results: Twenty-one women and 10 women underwent LD flap and extended LD flap reconstruction, respectively. The median patient age was 43 years. No demographic data differed between groups. Seroma, especially around the back incision, was the most common complication (90.5% in the LD flap and 90% in the extended LD group). Five patients in the LD flap group and one patient in the extended LD flap group showed decreased shoulder range of motion (ROM) at 6 months post-operation. Only one patient in the LD flap group showed impairment based on American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (ASES). The results did not differ significantly between groups; however, the LD flap group showed faster functional recovery. Conclusion: LD flap reconstruction can be performed with a very low impact on shoulder function. We observed a slightly decreased ROM for both LD flap techniques, with no impact on functional outcome.