Publication:
Comparisons of complications between extended latissimus dorsi flap and latissimus dorsi flap in total breast reconstruction: A prospective cohort study

dc.contributor.authorPrakasit Chirappaphaen_US
dc.contributor.authorPanya Thaweepworadejen_US
dc.contributor.authorKasamar Chitmethaen_US
dc.contributor.authorChayanoot Rattadiloken_US
dc.contributor.authorTeerawut Rakchoben_US
dc.contributor.authorThitipat Wattanakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorPanuwat Lertsithichaien_US
dc.contributor.authorMonchai Leesombatpaiboonen_US
dc.contributor.authorNopawan Sanjaroensutikulen_US
dc.contributor.otherBangkok Metropolitan Administrationen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-25T10:25:18Z
dc.date.available2020-08-25T10:25:18Z
dc.date.issued2020-08-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2020 The Authors Background: The latissimus dorsi (LD) flap is one of the most popular techniques in breast reconstruction. Although numerous studies have not shown functional impairment of the shoulder after surgery, other studies have reported significant functional impairment, especially after extended LD flap reconstruction. The present study compared functional deficit and shoulder movement between extended LD and LD flap reconstruction. Materials and methods: Between December 2015 and May 2018, this study enrolled 31 patients undergoing LD flap reconstruction. Data on patient demographics, operative details, morbidities, and degree of shoulder movement were collected. Outcomes were compared between the extended LD and LD flap groups. Results: Twenty-one women and 10 women underwent LD flap and extended LD flap reconstruction, respectively. The median patient age was 43 years. No demographic data differed between groups. Seroma, especially around the back incision, was the most common complication (90.5% in the LD flap and 90% in the extended LD group). Five patients in the LD flap group and one patient in the extended LD flap group showed decreased shoulder range of motion (ROM) at 6 months post-operation. Only one patient in the LD flap group showed impairment based on American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (ASES). The results did not differ significantly between groups; however, the LD flap group showed faster functional recovery. Conclusion: LD flap reconstruction can be performed with a very low impact on shoulder function. We observed a slightly decreased ROM for both LD flap techniques, with no impact on functional outcome.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAnnals of Medicine and Surgery. Vol.56, (2020), 197-202en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.amsu.2020.05.046en_US
dc.identifier.issn20490801en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85087212682en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/58040
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85087212682&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleComparisons of complications between extended latissimus dorsi flap and latissimus dorsi flap in total breast reconstruction: A prospective cohort studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85087212682&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections