Publication:
Effects of general and regional anesthesia on the neonate (a prospective, randomized trial)

dc.contributor.authorThrathip Kolataten_US
dc.contributor.authorJariya Lertakyamaneeen_US
dc.contributor.authorThara Tritrakarnen_US
dc.contributor.authorAchra Somboonnanondaen_US
dc.contributor.authorThitima Chinachoten_US
dc.contributor.authorJarinya Muangkasemen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-07T09:00:00Z
dc.date.available2018-09-07T09:00:00Z
dc.date.issued1999-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstractAnesthetic methods used during cesarean section have advantages and disadvantages to both mothers and infants and may result in short and long term neonatal effects. Objective : To determine the effects of general and regional anesthesia on the infants, a prospective, randomized trial was performed in Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University. Material and Method : 341 uncomplicated pregnant women who were to be delivered at term by Cesarean section were recruited and randomized to receive general anesthesia, GA (103); epidural anesthesia, EA (120) and spinal anesthesia, SA (118). The immediate fetal and neonatal effects were assessed by cord blood gas analysis and the infant's Apgar scores. The Neurologic and Adaptive Capacity Scores (NACS) was performed within 4 hours after birth by two pediatricians who were blind to the anesthetic method. Result : Maternal age, weight, height, duration of the operation and infants' birth weight were not different among the study groups. In the EA and SA group, maternal systolic blood pressure decreased more than 20 per cent from the baseline in more than half. The infants' Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes were 8.3±1.9; 8.2±1.6; 6.7±2.8, and 9.7±0.9; 9.8±0.7; 9.2±1.6 in EA, SA and GA group respectively. The adaptive capacity, active tone, passive tone, general assessment and primary reflexes of the NACS were not statistically different. Conclusion: Apgar scores of the infants whose mothers received general anesthesia were lower than infants whose mothers received regional anesthesia but the NACS were not statistically different among the three study groups.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol.82, No.1 (1999), 39-44en_US
dc.identifier.issn01252208en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-0043283286en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/25732
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0043283286&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleEffects of general and regional anesthesia on the neonate (a prospective, randomized trial)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0043283286&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections