Publication: Evaluation of a genus-specific rGroEL<inf>1-524</inf> IgM-ELISA and commercial ELISA kits during the course of leptospirosis in Thailand
dc.contributor.author | Santi Maneewatchararangsri | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Galayanee Doungchawee | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Thareerat Kalambaheti | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Viravarn Luvira | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ngamphol Soonthornworasiri | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Pisut Vattanatham | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Urai Chaisri | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Poom Adisakwattana | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-04T11:37:57Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-04T11:37:57Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-12-01 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | In the present study, we developed a genus-specific rGroEL1-524 IgM-ELISA assay for use in screening diagnosis of suspected leptospirosis among acute undifferentiated febrile illness patients during acute fever. The diagnostic accuracies of the rGroEL1–524 IgM-ELISA, commercial Panbio IgM-ELISA, and Virion-Serion Classic IgG-ELISA were evaluated using 133 Thai leptospirosis sera and 210 controls. Sensitivities were 91.7%, 59.6%, and 17.7% for acute infection, and the specificities were 92.6%, 90.2%, and 88.3% for the non-leptospirosis control, respectively. The rGroEL1-524 IgM-ELISA had high sensitivity, at 92.3% and 91.7%, among culture-positive and MAT-negative cases at 1–3 days post-onset of symptoms (DPO1–3), respectively. Impaired specificity on scrub typhus was found, possibly from antibody cross-reaction to ortholog GroEL. Commercial Panbio IgM-ELISA had sensitivities at DPO1–3 of 30.8% and 41.7% for culture-positive and MAT-negative cases whereas Virion-Serion IgG-ELISA showed sensitivities of 5.9% and 13.3%, respectively. The rGroEL1-524 IgM-ELISA could be useful as a screening test for early diagnosis. The performance of the commercial ELISA suggests the applicability of IgM-ELISA for diagnosis, while IgG-ELISA is useful for seroprevalence surveys. However, confirmation by reference tests is recommended. | en_US |
dc.format.mimetype | video/youtube | |
dc.identifier.citation | Scientific Reports. Vol.11, No.1 (2021) | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1038/s41598-021-99377-8 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 20452322 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 2-s2.0-85116388324 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/79210 | |
dc.rights | Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | SCOPUS | en_US |
dc.source.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85116388324&origin=inward | en_US |
dc.subject | Multidisciplinary | en_US |
dc.title | Evaluation of a genus-specific rGroEL<inf>1-524</inf> IgM-ELISA and commercial ELISA kits during the course of leptospirosis in Thailand | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
mediaObject.contentUrl | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thfi1yRiBtI | |
mu.datasource.scopus | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85116388324&origin=inward | en_US |