Publication:
Usefulness of a molecular strategy for the detection of bacterial DNA in patients with severe sepsis undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy

dc.contributor.authorRanistha Ratanaraten_US
dc.contributor.authorStefania Cazzavillanen_US
dc.contributor.authorZaccaria Riccien_US
dc.contributor.authorMario Rassuen_US
dc.contributor.authorChiara Segalaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMassimo Decalen_US
dc.contributor.authorDinna Cruzen_US
dc.contributor.authorValentina Corradien_US
dc.contributor.authorStefania Manfroen_US
dc.contributor.authorEric Roessleren_US
dc.contributor.authorNathan Levinen_US
dc.contributor.authorClaudio Roncoen_US
dc.contributor.otherOspedale San Bortoloen_US
dc.contributor.otherIRCCS Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesuen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherRenal Research Institute, LLCen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-20T07:06:40Z
dc.date.available2018-08-20T07:06:40Z
dc.date.issued2006-12-01en_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Sepsis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. Sepsis is associated with cell necrosis and apoptosis. Circulating plasma levels of DNA have been found in conditions associated with cell death, including sepsis, pregnancy, stroke, myocardial infarction and trauma. Plasma DNA can also derive from bacteria. We have recently implemented a method to detect bacterial DNA and, in the present study, we validated this technique comparing it to standard blood culture in terms of diagnostic efficacy. Methods: We examined a cohort of 9 critically ill patients with a diagnosis of severe sepsis and acute renal failure requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). We analyzed bacterial DNA in blood, hemofilters, and ultrafiltrate (UF) by polymerase chain reaction amplification of 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis. Standard blood cultures were performed for all patients. Results: The blood cultures from 2 of the 9 (22%) patients were positive. However, bacterial DNA was identified in the blood of 6 patients (67%), including the 2 septic patients with positive blood cultures. In 9 (100%) patients bacterial DNA was found on the filter blood side, whereas in 7 (78%) subjects it was found in the dialysate compartment of the hemofilters. Bacterial DNA was never detected in the UF. Conclusions: Using the 16S rRNA gene, the detection of bacterial DNA in blood and adsorbed within the filter could be a useful screening tool in clinically septic, blood culture-negative patients undergoing CRRT. However, the identification of the etiologic agent is not feasible with this technique because specific primers for the defined bacteria must be used to further identify the suspected pathogenic organisms. Copyright © 2007 S. Karger AG.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBlood Purification. Vol.25, No.1 (2006), 106-111en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1159/000096406en_US
dc.identifier.issn02535068en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-33845753436en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/23460
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33845753436&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleUsefulness of a molecular strategy for the detection of bacterial DNA in patients with severe sepsis undergoing continuous renal replacement therapyen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33845753436&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections