Publication: A comparison of the hemodynamic effects of fluid bolus therapy with crystalloids vs. 4% albumin and vs. 20% albumin in patients after cardiac surgery
Issued Date
2021-11-01
Resource Type
ISSN
15273288
01479563
01479563
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85112553955
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Heart and Lung. Vol.50, No.6 (2021), 870-876
Suggested Citation
Fumitaka Yanase, Salvatore L. Cutuli, Thummaporn Naorungroj, Laurent Bitker, Anthony Wilson, Glenn M. Eastwood, Rinaldo Bellomo A comparison of the hemodynamic effects of fluid bolus therapy with crystalloids vs. 4% albumin and vs. 20% albumin in patients after cardiac surgery. Heart and Lung. Vol.50, No.6 (2021), 870-876. doi:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2021.07.014 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/77740
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
A comparison of the hemodynamic effects of fluid bolus therapy with crystalloids vs. 4% albumin and vs. 20% albumin in patients after cardiac surgery
Abstract
Background: Crystalloids, 4% albumin and 20% albumin are used for fluid bolus therapy (FBT) in patients after cardiac surgery. However, their detailed early (30 min) hemodynamic effects remain unstudied. Methods: In a comparative prospective observational trial of 120 ventilated, we studied post cardiac surgery patients who received crystalloid 500 ml FBT, 4% albumin 500 ml FBT or 20% albumin 100 ml FBT (40 per group). We recorded second-by-second hemodynamic parameters and 15-minutely cardiac index (CI) data before and for 30 min after FBT. We compared the crystalloid group (reference) vs. the 4% albumin group, and vs. the 20% albumin group. Results: Immediately after FBT, the mean (standard deviation) CI increase was 0.4 (0.4) L/min/m2 with crystalloids, 0.4 (0.5) L/min/m2 with 4% albumin and 0.3 (0.4) L/min/m2 with 20% albumin, despite the much smaller FBT volume with 20% albumin. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) increase was 11 (10), 12 (9) and 9 (6) mm Hg, respectively. There was no group effect or interaction for changes in CI. However, there were time-group interactions for MAP changes such that crystalloid FBT had faster MAP reduction than 4% (p<0.001) or 20% albumin (p < 0.001). Moreover, patients treated with crystalloid FBT showed a faster decline in central venous pressure, perfusion pressure than the two groups. Finally, 20% albumin attenuated the fall in temperature induced by FBT. Conclusion: In postoperative cardiac surgery patients, after a similar initial CI and MAP response, the MAP effect of crystalloid FBT dissipates faster than that of 4% or 20% albumin FBT. These findings can be used to inform clinical practice.