Publication:
A comparison of the hemodynamic effects of fluid bolus therapy with crystalloids vs. 4% albumin and vs. 20% albumin in patients after cardiac surgery

dc.contributor.authorFumitaka Yanaseen_US
dc.contributor.authorSalvatore L. Cutulien_US
dc.contributor.authorThummaporn Naorungrojen_US
dc.contributor.authorLaurent Bitkeren_US
dc.contributor.authorAnthony Wilsonen_US
dc.contributor.authorGlenn M. Eastwooden_US
dc.contributor.authorRinaldo Bellomoen_US
dc.contributor.otherSiriraj Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherMelbourne Medical Schoolen_US
dc.contributor.otherFondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCSen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campus di Romaen_US
dc.contributor.otherMonash Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherHopital de la Croix-Rousseen_US
dc.contributor.otherAustin Hospitalen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T09:08:52Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T09:08:52Z
dc.date.issued2021-11-01en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Crystalloids, 4% albumin and 20% albumin are used for fluid bolus therapy (FBT) in patients after cardiac surgery. However, their detailed early (30 min) hemodynamic effects remain unstudied. Methods: In a comparative prospective observational trial of 120 ventilated, we studied post cardiac surgery patients who received crystalloid 500 ml FBT, 4% albumin 500 ml FBT or 20% albumin 100 ml FBT (40 per group). We recorded second-by-second hemodynamic parameters and 15-minutely cardiac index (CI) data before and for 30 min after FBT. We compared the crystalloid group (reference) vs. the 4% albumin group, and vs. the 20% albumin group. Results: Immediately after FBT, the mean (standard deviation) CI increase was 0.4 (0.4) L/min/m2 with crystalloids, 0.4 (0.5) L/min/m2 with 4% albumin and 0.3 (0.4) L/min/m2 with 20% albumin, despite the much smaller FBT volume with 20% albumin. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) increase was 11 (10), 12 (9) and 9 (6) mm Hg, respectively. There was no group effect or interaction for changes in CI. However, there were time-group interactions for MAP changes such that crystalloid FBT had faster MAP reduction than 4% (p<0.001) or 20% albumin (p < 0.001). Moreover, patients treated with crystalloid FBT showed a faster decline in central venous pressure, perfusion pressure than the two groups. Finally, 20% albumin attenuated the fall in temperature induced by FBT. Conclusion: In postoperative cardiac surgery patients, after a similar initial CI and MAP response, the MAP effect of crystalloid FBT dissipates faster than that of 4% or 20% albumin FBT. These findings can be used to inform clinical practice.en_US
dc.identifier.citationHeart and Lung. Vol.50, No.6 (2021), 870-876en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.hrtlng.2021.07.014en_US
dc.identifier.issn15273288en_US
dc.identifier.issn01479563en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85112553955en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/77740
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85112553955&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleA comparison of the hemodynamic effects of fluid bolus therapy with crystalloids vs. 4% albumin and vs. 20% albumin in patients after cardiac surgeryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85112553955&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections