Publication: Comparison of protease inhibitor (PI) resistance-associated mutations between PI-naïve and PI-experienced HIV-1 infected patients in Thailand where subtype A/E is predominant
Issued Date
2010-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
1570162X
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-78249260910
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Current HIV Research. Vol.8, No.6 (2010), 456-460
Suggested Citation
S. Wiboonchutikul, Somnuek Sungkanuparph, Chonlaphat Sukasem, Chorthip Wathipthun, Wasun Chantratita Comparison of protease inhibitor (PI) resistance-associated mutations between PI-naïve and PI-experienced HIV-1 infected patients in Thailand where subtype A/E is predominant. Current HIV Research. Vol.8, No.6 (2010), 456-460. doi:10.2174/157016210793499321 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/29281
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Comparison of protease inhibitor (PI) resistance-associated mutations between PI-naïve and PI-experienced HIV-1 infected patients in Thailand where subtype A/E is predominant
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Protease inhibitor (PI) resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) are commonly observed in PI-naïve patients who are infected with HIV-1 subtype A/E. Few data are available on the genetic mechanisms of PI resistance in non-B HIV-1. This study was aimed to compare PI-RAMs between PI-naïve and -experienced patients and determine PI resistance in each group. Genotypic resistance testing was conducted among a cohort of HIV-1-infected patients who were diagnosed with virologic failure. We studied 137 patients of whom 75 patients were in PI-naïve group and 62 patients in PI-experienced group. Median CD4 cell count and HIV-1 RNA at virologic failure were 169 cells/mm3and 14,100 copies/mL, respectively. The clinical characteristics between 2 groups were similar (p>0.05) except for the duration of antiretroviral therapy (ART) which was shorter in PI-naïve group (31.5 vs 46.8 months, p=0.028). Proportion of patients with primary PI-RAMs was 2.7% in PI-naïve and 19% in PI-experienced groups (p=0.002). The most common primary PI-RAMs in the latter group were V82A (10%), I54V (7%) and G48V (4.8%). Proportion of patients with secondary PI-RAMs in the corresponding groups was 99% and 98%, respectively (p=1.000). The most common secondary PI-RAMs in both groups were M36I (91%), H69K (34%) and L89M (30%). In conclusion, primary PI-RAMs are observed exclusively among PI-experienced patients, whereas secondary PI-RAMs are equally found in both PI-naïve and PI-experienced patients. Further studies to define virologic response of HIV-1 subtype A/E to various PIs and clinical validation of PI-RAMs in HIV-1 subtype A/E are essentially needed. © 2010 Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
