Publication:
Comparison of protease inhibitor (PI) resistance-associated mutations between PI-naïve and PI-experienced HIV-1 infected patients in Thailand where subtype A/E is predominant

dc.contributor.authorS. Wiboonchutikulen_US
dc.contributor.authorSomnuek Sungkanuparphen_US
dc.contributor.authorChonlaphat Sukasemen_US
dc.contributor.authorChorthip Wathipthunen_US
dc.contributor.authorWasun Chantratitaen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-24T09:08:36Z
dc.date.available2018-09-24T09:08:36Z
dc.date.issued2010-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstractProtease inhibitor (PI) resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) are commonly observed in PI-naïve patients who are infected with HIV-1 subtype A/E. Few data are available on the genetic mechanisms of PI resistance in non-B HIV-1. This study was aimed to compare PI-RAMs between PI-naïve and -experienced patients and determine PI resistance in each group. Genotypic resistance testing was conducted among a cohort of HIV-1-infected patients who were diagnosed with virologic failure. We studied 137 patients of whom 75 patients were in PI-naïve group and 62 patients in PI-experienced group. Median CD4 cell count and HIV-1 RNA at virologic failure were 169 cells/mm3and 14,100 copies/mL, respectively. The clinical characteristics between 2 groups were similar (p>0.05) except for the duration of antiretroviral therapy (ART) which was shorter in PI-naïve group (31.5 vs 46.8 months, p=0.028). Proportion of patients with primary PI-RAMs was 2.7% in PI-naïve and 19% in PI-experienced groups (p=0.002). The most common primary PI-RAMs in the latter group were V82A (10%), I54V (7%) and G48V (4.8%). Proportion of patients with secondary PI-RAMs in the corresponding groups was 99% and 98%, respectively (p=1.000). The most common secondary PI-RAMs in both groups were M36I (91%), H69K (34%) and L89M (30%). In conclusion, primary PI-RAMs are observed exclusively among PI-experienced patients, whereas secondary PI-RAMs are equally found in both PI-naïve and PI-experienced patients. Further studies to define virologic response of HIV-1 subtype A/E to various PIs and clinical validation of PI-RAMs in HIV-1 subtype A/E are essentially needed. © 2010 Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.en_US
dc.identifier.citationCurrent HIV Research. Vol.8, No.6 (2010), 456-460en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2174/157016210793499321en_US
dc.identifier.issn1570162Xen_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-78249260910en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/29281
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=78249260910&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleComparison of protease inhibitor (PI) resistance-associated mutations between PI-naïve and PI-experienced HIV-1 infected patients in Thailand where subtype A/E is predominanten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=78249260910&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections