Publication: Evaluation of the Pint of Science festival in Thailand
Issued Date
2019-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
19326203
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85069643638
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
PLoS ONE. Vol.14, No.7 (2019)
Suggested Citation
Bipin Adhikari, Phyu Hnin Hlaing, Matthew T. Robinson, Andrea Ruecker, Noel Hidalgo Tan, Nattapat Jatupornpimol, Rita Chanviriyavuth, Phaik Yeong Cheah Evaluation of the Pint of Science festival in Thailand. PLoS ONE. Vol.14, No.7 (2019). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0219983 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/49923
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Evaluation of the Pint of Science festival in Thailand
Abstract
© 2019 Adhikari et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Background The Pint of Science festival is the biggest annual international science festival. In May 2017, we coordinated the first Pint of Science festival in Thailand and reported our initial reflections. Building on this work, we set out to evaluate more systematically events conducted in 2018. Methods In 2018, we conducted Pint of Science events at four different locations in Bangkok. Overall, there were 18 talks held over six event-days in 2018. We administered 180 self-reported questionnaires as well as conducted 11 semi-structured interviews and a focus group discussion with audience members and speakers. Results Of the 180 questionnaires handed out, 125 attendees completed the questionnaire. The majority of attendees came because they were interested in science (68.0%), to learn something new (46.4%) and to enjoy themselves (44.8%). Our qualitative results confirm the quantitative findings. In addition, speakers viewed that they benefited by improving their communication skills and having the opportunity to network with scientists and non-scientists. Speakers also mentioned that such events were a good means to engage with the public, can improve the visibility of their work and potentially attract more funding. To improve the Pint of Science activities, audience members suggested to include a more diverse range of topics, more collaborations with other local research institutions and to hold the event at larger venues. Conclusions We conclude that Pint of Science was well received in Bangkok with recommendations to improve minor issues related to practicalities and logistics.