Publication:
Evaluation of the Pint of Science festival in Thailand

dc.contributor.authorBipin Adhikarien_US
dc.contributor.authorPhyu Hnin Hlaingen_US
dc.contributor.authorMatthew T. Robinsonen_US
dc.contributor.authorAndrea Rueckeren_US
dc.contributor.authorNoel Hidalgo Tanen_US
dc.contributor.authorNattapat Jatupornpimolen_US
dc.contributor.authorRita Chanviriyavuthen_US
dc.contributor.authorPhaik Yeong Cheahen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Oxforden_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherNuffield Department of Clinical Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherSoutheast Asian Regional Centre for Archaeology and Fine Arts (SEAMEO SPAFA)en_US
dc.contributor.otherMahosot Hospitalen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T07:31:11Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T07:31:11Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2019 Adhikari et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Background The Pint of Science festival is the biggest annual international science festival. In May 2017, we coordinated the first Pint of Science festival in Thailand and reported our initial reflections. Building on this work, we set out to evaluate more systematically events conducted in 2018. Methods In 2018, we conducted Pint of Science events at four different locations in Bangkok. Overall, there were 18 talks held over six event-days in 2018. We administered 180 self-reported questionnaires as well as conducted 11 semi-structured interviews and a focus group discussion with audience members and speakers. Results Of the 180 questionnaires handed out, 125 attendees completed the questionnaire. The majority of attendees came because they were interested in science (68.0%), to learn something new (46.4%) and to enjoy themselves (44.8%). Our qualitative results confirm the quantitative findings. In addition, speakers viewed that they benefited by improving their communication skills and having the opportunity to network with scientists and non-scientists. Speakers also mentioned that such events were a good means to engage with the public, can improve the visibility of their work and potentially attract more funding. To improve the Pint of Science activities, audience members suggested to include a more diverse range of topics, more collaborations with other local research institutions and to hold the event at larger venues. Conclusions We conclude that Pint of Science was well received in Bangkok with recommendations to improve minor issues related to practicalities and logistics.en_US
dc.identifier.citationPLoS ONE. Vol.14, No.7 (2019)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0219983en_US
dc.identifier.issn19326203en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85069643638en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/49923
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85069643638&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of the Pint of Science festival in Thailanden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85069643638&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections