Publication: Community engagement for the rapid elimination of malaria: the case of Kayin State, Myanmar
Issued Date
2017-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
2398502X
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85039153810
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Wellcome Open Research. Vol.2, (2017)
Suggested Citation
Ladda Kajeechiwa, May Myo Thwin, Suphak Nosten, Saw Win Tun, Daniel Parker, Lorenz Von Seidlein, Decha Tangseefa, François Nosten, Phaik Yeong Cheah Community engagement for the rapid elimination of malaria: the case of Kayin State, Myanmar. Wellcome Open Research. Vol.2, (2017). doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.12051.1 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/42085
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Community engagement for the rapid elimination of malaria: the case of Kayin State, Myanmar
Abstract
© 2017 Kajeechiwa L et al. Background: Currently, malaria elimination efforts are ongoing in several locations across Southeast Asia, including in Kayin State (also known as Karen State), Myanmar . This paper describes the community engagement efforts for a pilot malaria elimination project, the challenges encountered and lessons learnt. Methods: Between May 2013 and June 2015, a study on targeted malaria elimination (TME) that included mass drug administration was conducted in four villages (TPN, TOT, KNH, and HKT) of Kayin State. Community engagement efforts included workshops, meetings and house-to-house visits with community members. Exhibitions related to malaria and fun activities were organized for children. In addition, we provided primary care, small individual incentives and village-level incentives. This paper is based on our analysis of data extracted from meeting minutes, field notes, feedback sessions among staff and with community members as well as our own reflections. Results: Average participation across three rounds of MDA were 84.4%, 57.4%, 88.6% and 59.3% for TPN, TOT, KNH and HKT, respectively. Community engagement was fraught with practical challenges such as seasonal tasks of the villagers. There were challenges in explaining difficult concepts like drug resistance and submicroscopic infection. Another was understanding and navigating the politics of these villages, which are located in politically contested areas. Managing expectations of villagers was difficult as they assumed that the community team must know everything related to health. Conclusions: In the TME project, many different community engagement strategies were employed. We encountered many challenges which included logistical, scientific and political difficulties. An approach that is tailored to the local population is key.