Publication:
Community engagement for the rapid elimination of malaria: the case of Kayin State, Myanmar

dc.contributor.authorLadda Kajeechiwaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMay Myo Thwinen_US
dc.contributor.authorSuphak Nostenen_US
dc.contributor.authorSaw Win Tunen_US
dc.contributor.authorDaniel Parkeren_US
dc.contributor.authorLorenz Von Seidleinen_US
dc.contributor.authorDecha Tangseefaen_US
dc.contributor.authorFrançois Nostenen_US
dc.contributor.authorPhaik Yeong Cheahen_US
dc.contributor.otherShoklo Malaria Research Uniten_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherNuffield Department of Clinical Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherThammasat Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Oxforden_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-21T07:00:30Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-14T08:03:06Z
dc.date.available2018-12-21T07:00:30Z
dc.date.available2019-03-14T08:03:06Z
dc.date.issued2017-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2017 Kajeechiwa L et al. Background: Currently, malaria elimination efforts are ongoing in several locations across Southeast Asia, including in Kayin State (also known as Karen State), Myanmar . This paper describes the community engagement efforts for a pilot malaria elimination project, the challenges encountered and lessons learnt. Methods: Between May 2013 and June 2015, a study on targeted malaria elimination (TME) that included mass drug administration was conducted in four villages (TPN, TOT, KNH, and HKT) of Kayin State. Community engagement efforts included workshops, meetings and house-to-house visits with community members. Exhibitions related to malaria and fun activities were organized for children. In addition, we provided primary care, small individual incentives and village-level incentives. This paper is based on our analysis of data extracted from meeting minutes, field notes, feedback sessions among staff and with community members as well as our own reflections. Results: Average participation across three rounds of MDA were 84.4%, 57.4%, 88.6% and 59.3% for TPN, TOT, KNH and HKT, respectively. Community engagement was fraught with practical challenges such as seasonal tasks of the villagers. There were challenges in explaining difficult concepts like drug resistance and submicroscopic infection. Another was understanding and navigating the politics of these villages, which are located in politically contested areas. Managing expectations of villagers was difficult as they assumed that the community team must know everything related to health. Conclusions: In the TME project, many different community engagement strategies were employed. We encountered many challenges which included logistical, scientific and political difficulties. An approach that is tailored to the local population is key.en_US
dc.identifier.citationWellcome Open Research. Vol.2, (2017)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.12688/wellcomeopenres.12051.1en_US
dc.identifier.issn2398502Xen_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85039153810en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/42085
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85039153810&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.titleCommunity engagement for the rapid elimination of malaria: the case of Kayin State, Myanmaren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85039153810&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections