Publication: Effectiveness, safety and efficacy of INTELLiVENT–adaptive support ventilation, a closed–loop ventilation mode for use in ICU patients–a systematic review
Issued Date
2021-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
17476356
17476348
17476348
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85110541924
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine. Vol.15, No.11 (2021), 1403-1413
Suggested Citation
M. Botta, E. F.E. Wenstedt, A. M. Tsonas, L. A. Buiteman-Kruizinga, D. M.P. van Meenen, H. H.M. Korsten, J. Horn, F. Paulus, A. G.J.H. Bindels, M. J. Schultz, A. J.R. De Bie Effectiveness, safety and efficacy of INTELLiVENT–adaptive support ventilation, a closed–loop ventilation mode for use in ICU patients–a systematic review. Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine. Vol.15, No.11 (2021), 1403-1413. doi:10.1080/17476348.2021.1933450 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/78684
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Effectiveness, safety and efficacy of INTELLiVENT–adaptive support ventilation, a closed–loop ventilation mode for use in ICU patients–a systematic review
Abstract
Introduction: INTELLiVENT–Adaptive Support Ventilation (INTELLiVENT–ASV), an advanced closed–loop ventilation mode for use in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, is equipped with algorithms that automatically adjust settings on the basis of physiologic signals and patient’s activity. Here we describe its effectiveness, safety, and efficacy in various types of ICU patients. Areas covered: A systematic search conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and in Google Scholar identified 10 randomized clinical trials. Expert opinion: Studies suggest INTELLiVENT–ASV to be an effective automated mode with regard to the titrations of tidal volume, airway pressure, and oxygen. INTELLiVENT–ASV is as safe as conventional modes. However, thus far studies have not shown INTELLiVENT–ASV to be superior to conventional modes with regard to duration of ventilation and other patient–centered outcomes. Future studies are needed to test its efficacy.