The Evaluation of Content Relevance and Representativeness of the New Stroke Risk Screening Scales
Issued Date
2024-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
10547738
eISSN
15523799
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85203430122
Journal Title
Clinical Nursing Research
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Clinical Nursing Research (2024)
Suggested Citation
Ruksakulpiwat S., Voss J.G., Challa A.K., Kudlowitz A. The Evaluation of Content Relevance and Representativeness of the New Stroke Risk Screening Scales. Clinical Nursing Research (2024). doi:10.1177/10547738241273864 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/101217
Title
The Evaluation of Content Relevance and Representativeness of the New Stroke Risk Screening Scales
Author(s)
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Early and comprehensive risk identification is essential for identifying individuals at high risk for stroke. This study aimed to evaluate each question in the new Stroke Risk Screening Scales (SRSS) and assess the domains for content relevance and representativeness. Initially, six stroke experts were invited to evaluate the SRSS questions. The content validity index (CVI), including the item-CVI (I-CVI) and the average-CVI (Ave-CVI), was then calculated. In our study, the acceptable standards for I-CVI and Ave-CVI were ≥0.78 and ≥0.9, respectively. The results showed that all invited experts accepted the invitation and evaluated the SRSS questions. The previous version of the SRSS consisted of 33 questions. Of these, 30 questions reached an I-CVI of ≥0.78, indicating good content validity. Three questions had an I-CVI of 0.67 and were considered invalid; thus, they were deleted. The overall instrument achieved an Ave-CVI of 0.95. Comprehensive SRSS are essential for effective stroke prevention planning. By facilitating the early identification of individuals at high risk for stroke, these scales help reduce the incidence and impact of stroke. The high content validity found in this study supports the reliability of the SRSS as a screening tool. In the future, implementing such validated scales in clinical practice can improve early intervention strategies, ultimately enhancing health outcomes and optimizing the use of healthcare resources.