Publication: The Evaluation of Strategic Development Plans of Samut Sakhon Provincial Administration Organization
1
Issued Date
2024
Resource Type
Resource Version
Accepted Manuscript
Language
eng
File Type
application/pdf
ISSN
2350-983x
Journal Title
Integrated Social Science Journal
Volume
11
Issue
2
Start Page
176
End Page
186
Access Rights
open access
Rights
ผลงานนี้เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของมหาวิทยาลัยมหิดล ขอสงวนไว้สำหรับเพื่อการศึกษาเท่านั้น ต้องอ้างอิงแหล่งที่มา ห้ามดัดแปลงเนื้อหา และห้ามนำไปใช้เพื่อการค้า
Rights Holder(s)
Department of Social Sciences Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities Mahidol University
Bibliographic Citation
Integrated Social Science Journal. Vol. 11, No. 2 (July-December 2024), 176-186
Suggested Citation
Seree Woraphong The Evaluation of Strategic Development Plans of Samut Sakhon Provincial Administration Organization. Integrated Social Science Journal. Vol. 11, No. 2 (July-December 2024), 176-186. 186. Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/109581
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
The Evaluation of Strategic Development Plans of Samut Sakhon Provincial Administration Organization
Author(s)
Abstract
This study aims at 1) studying the basic information about the strategic development plans of
Samut Sakhon provincial administration organization (PAO), 2) evaluating the results of the strategic development plans of Samut Sakhon PAO, 3) studying the problem and obstacle in the implementation of the strategic development plans of Samut Sakhon PAO, and 4) proposing guidelines for effective developing the strategic development plans of Samut Sakhon PAO. The data were collected by surveying 400 stakeholders of Samut Sakhon PAO and interviewing 10 key informants. The results showed that the local citizen samples were satisfied with Samut Sakhon PAO’s 6 strategic developmental plans, namely (1) education development strategy, (2) quality-of-life enhancement strategy, (3) economic development strategy, (4) infrastructure development strategy, (5) environmental conservation and rehabilitation strategy, and (6) city development and administration strategy. Considering the dimensions ranking from the highest to lowest satisfaction scores, it was found that economic development strategy had the highest score (X ̅= 3.97), followed by infrastructure development strategy (X ̅ = 3.90), education development strategy (X ̅ = 3.88), quality-of-life enhancement strategy (X ̅ = 3.87), environmental conservation and rehabilitation strategy (X ̅= 3.82), and city development and administration strategy (X ̅ = 3.82), respectively. These lead to formulating recommendations on the effective and efficient implementation of policy for both the national and provincial level by making plans more practical and solving the economic problems in order to respond to people’s needs and also evaluating the implementation of the strategic development plan in every step.