Evaluating English-medium instruction through Q methodology: Insights from a business program
Issued Date
2026-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
00336882
eISSN
1745526X
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-105030718782
Journal Title
Relc Journal
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Relc Journal (2026)
Suggested Citation
Thumvichit A., Tangkiengsirisin S., Pan Z. Evaluating English-medium instruction through Q methodology: Insights from a business program. Relc Journal (2026). doi:10.1177/00336882261423207 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/115461
Title
Evaluating English-medium instruction through Q methodology: Insights from a business program
Author(s)
Author's Affiliation
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Scholars and practitioners have raised concerns regarding the implementation of English-medium instruction (EMI) in higher education, one of which relates to the complete lack of universal guidelines for quality assurance purposes. This study illustrates how the English-Medium Instruction Q Evaluation (EMI-QE), a systematic tool for evaluating EMI components in higher education programs, can be applied in practice. Following the principles of Q methodology, it integrates a forced-distribution data collection technique and by-person factor analysis to systematically identify different stakeholder-experience profiles. A Business Administration program was evaluated with 50 students serving as participants, who sorted 40 statements onto a Q-sort grid and took part in semi-structured interviews. The findings highlight both strengths and areas for improvement, which can be grouped into three main domains: (1) lecturers’ use of English, (2) barriers to classroom participation, and (3) institutional support. Methodological implications are also discussed to demonstrate how the EMI-QE can help bridge the gap between EMI research and practice. The EMI-QE was found to be a useful means for assessing stakeholders’ subjective experiences in a systematic way, which turned them into actionable data for program improvement. It could also be used as a formative tool to guide ongoing development of the program.