Publication: Can we predict final outcome of internal medicine residents with in-training evaluation.
Submitted Date
Received Date
Accepted Date
Issued Date
2011-02-01
Copyright Date
Announcement No.
Application No.
Patent No.
Valid Date
Resource Type
Edition
Resource Version
Language
File Type
No. of Pages/File Size
ISBN
ISSN
01252208
eISSN
DOI
Scopus ID
WOS ID
Pubmed ID
arXiv ID
Call No.
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-80054832759
Journal Title
Volume
Issue
item.page.oaire.edition
Start Page
End Page
Access Rights
Access Status
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Physical Location
Bibliographic Citation
Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet. Vol.94 Suppl 1, (2011)
Citation
Nitipatana Chierakul, Supot Pongprasobchai, Kanokwan Boonyapisit, Yingyong Chinthammitr, Manop Pithukpakorn, Adisak Maneesai, Apiradee Srivijitkamol, Pornpan Koomanachai, Ajchara Koolvisoot, Tawesak Tanwandee, Chairat Shayakul, Udom Kachintorn (2011). Can we predict final outcome of internal medicine residents with in-training evaluation.. Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/12680.
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Can we predict final outcome of internal medicine residents with in-training evaluation.
Alternative Title(s)
Author's Affiliation
Author's E-mail
Editor(s)
Editor's Affiliation
Corresponding Author(s)
Creator(s)
Compiler
Advisor(s)
Illustrator(s)
Applicant(s)
Inventor(s)
Issuer
Assignee
Other Contributor(s)
Series
Has Part
Abstract
To assess the predictive value of in-training evaluation for determining future success in the internal medicine board certifying examination. Ninety-seven internal medicine residents from Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital who undertake the Thai Board examination during the academic year 2006-2008 were enrolled. Correlation between the scores during internal medicine rotation and final scores in board examination were then examined. Significant positive linear correlation was found between scores from both written and clinical parts of board certifying examination and scores from the first-year summative written and clinical examinations and also the second-year formative written examination (r = 0.43-0.68, p < 0.001). Monthly evaluation by attending staffs was less well correlated (r = 0.29-0.36) and the evaluation by nurses or medical students demonstrated inverse relationship (r = -0.2, p = 0.27 and r = -0.13, p = 0.48). Some methods of in-training evaluation can predict successful outcome of board certifying examination. Multisource assessments cannot well extrapolate some aspects of professional competences and qualities.