Publication: Assessment of putative tests for protective immunity to falciparum malaria.
Issued Date
1989-09-01
Resource Type
ISSN
01251562
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-0024723147
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
The Southeast Asian journal of tropical medicine and public health. Vol.20, No.3 (1989), 385-397
Suggested Citation
S. Tharavanij, P. Tapchaisri, S. Ketrangsee, J. Kunnaphuti, Y. Mahakunkijcharoen, O. Chitayothin, N. Thammapalerd, A. Sabchareon Assessment of putative tests for protective immunity to falciparum malaria.. The Southeast Asian journal of tropical medicine and public health. Vol.20, No.3 (1989), 385-397. Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/15796
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Assessment of putative tests for protective immunity to falciparum malaria.
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Sera from clinically immune individuals comprising 10 hospitalised patients (Group I), 30 persons residing in a malaria endemic area in Thailand (Group II) and 8 persons from a hyperendemic area in Ivory Coast (Group III) were tested by the parasite growth inhibition (PGI), indirect fluorescent antibody test of ring-infected erythrocyte surface antigen (RESA-IFA), urease-ELISA and Western blot. Paired sera from patients recovering from malaria (Group IV) as well as sera from blood donors were also tested. In the PGI test, sera were tested against three uncloned isolates of P. falciparum comprising SO, I4 and AE9 (PGI-SO, PGI-I4 and PGI-AE9 respectively). When growth inhibition of greater than or equal to 30% against any one of the three isolates was considered positive, the positive rate for the combined Groups I, II and III was 78.7%. Further analysis showed that the positive rates for PGI-SO, PGI-I4 and PGI-AE9 were 63.8%, 59.5% and 59.5% respectively and were not significantly different (p greater than 0.05). Comparison between PGI-SO, PGI-I4 and PGI-AE9 activities of Groups I, II and III sera showed no significant differences in any comparison groups except with PGI-AE9 in which Group III sera were more frequently positive than Group II sera (p = 0.004). Follow-up of PGI-SO and PGI-AE9 activities in Group IV patients showed mostly a decrease or no change in the activities of the convalescent sera taken 63 days later. RESA-IFA positive rate in the combined Groups I, II and III sera was 91.7%. There were no significant differences either in the seropositive rates or in the geometric mean antibody titers (GMT) between Groups I, II and III sera. Follow-up in Group IV patients showed no change in antibody titers in 64% of cases, decrease and increase in titers in 29% and 7% of cases respectively. The urease-ELISA seropositive rate in the combined Groups (I, II and III) was 89.5% which is not significantly different from that of RESA-IFA (p greater than 0.05). Comparison between individual Groups (I, II and III) likewise showed no significant differences in both GMT and seropositive rates. Follow-up in Group IV sera showed either no change or a decrease in antibody titers in 55.6% and 44.4% of cases respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)