Publication: Apical sealing ability of glass ionomer sealer with and without smear layer
Submitted Date
Received Date
Accepted Date
Issued Date
1998-01-01
Copyright Date
Announcement No.
Application No.
Patent No.
Valid Date
Resource Type
Edition
Resource Version
Language
File Type
No. of Pages/File Size
ISBN
ISSN
00992399
eISSN
Scopus ID
WOS ID
Pubmed ID
arXiv ID
Call No.
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-0032062435
Journal Title
Volume
Issue
item.page.oaire.edition
Start Page
End Page
Access Rights
Access Status
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Physical Location
Bibliographic Citation
Journal of Endodontics. Vol.24, No.5 (1998), 343-345
Citation
Siriporn Timpawat, Somsak Sripanaratanakul (1998). Apical sealing ability of glass ionomer sealer with and without smear layer. Retrieved from: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14594/18352.
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Apical sealing ability of glass ionomer sealer with and without smear layer
Alternative Title(s)
Author(s)
Author's Affiliation
Author's E-mail
Editor(s)
Editor's Affiliation
Corresponding Author(s)
Creator(s)
Compiler
Advisor(s)
Illustrator(s)
Applicant(s)
Inventor(s)
Issuer
Assignee
Other Contributor(s)
Series
Has Part
Abstract
The effect of two different root canal cements and removal of the smear layer on the apical seal in roots obturated with Thermafil obturators was tested. Thirty extracted human mandibular first molars with 60 canals (mesial roots) were instrumented with the use of a step-back technique. Teeth were placed into 6 groups of 10 canals each. The first three groups had the smear layer removed with EDTA and NaOCl, and the other three groups were irrigated with NaOCl only. Canals were obturated using Thermafil without sealer cement or Thermafil with Ketac-Endo or Thermafil with zinc oxide-eugenol cement. All roots were placed in India ink for 4 days. The roots were cleared, and the degree of linear dye penetration was measured. The study showed that root canal cement significantly improved the apical seal of the Thermafil obturation technique (p < 0.05), whether the smear layer was removed or not. The apical seal exhibited by Ketac-Endo was not significantly different from that provided by zinc oxide-eugenol cement (p > 0.05), regardless of the presence or absence of a smear layer. Copyright © 1998 by The American Association of Endodontists.