Publication: Surgical outcomes of microsurgical selective peripheral neurotomy for intractable limb spasticity
Submitted Date
Received Date
Accepted Date
Issued Date
2013-01-01
Copyright Date
Announcement No.
Application No.
Patent No.
Valid Date
Resource Type
Edition
Resource Version
Language
File Type
No. of Pages/File Size
ISBN
ISSN
14230372
10116125
10116125
eISSN
Scopus ID
WOS ID
Pubmed ID
arXiv ID
Call No.
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-84875680561
Journal Title
Volume
Issue
item.page.oaire.edition
Start Page
End Page
Access Rights
Access Status
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Physical Location
Bibliographic Citation
Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery. Vol.91, No.4 (2013), 248-257
Citation
Bunpot Sitthinamsuwan, Kannachod Chanvanitkulchai, Luckchai Phonwijit, Sarun Nunta-Aree, Witsanu Kumthornthip, Teerada Ploypetch (2013). Surgical outcomes of microsurgical selective peripheral neurotomy for intractable limb spasticity. Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/32595.
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Surgical outcomes of microsurgical selective peripheral neurotomy for intractable limb spasticity
Alternative Title(s)
Author's Affiliation
Author's E-mail
Editor(s)
Editor's Affiliation
Corresponding Author(s)
Creator(s)
Compiler
Advisor(s)
Illustrator(s)
Applicant(s)
Inventor(s)
Issuer
Assignee
Other Contributor(s)
Series
Has Part
Abstract
© 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel. Background: The authors frequently employed selective peripheral neurotomy (SPN) as the primary treatment of severe intractable focal and multifocal spastic hypertonia. We occasionally operated SPN in diffuse spastic disorders. Objective: To study surgical outcome of SPN in terms of severity of spasticity and functional condition. Methods: Patients harboring refractory harmful spasticity of various origins were enrolled into the present study. They were clinically evaluated by using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), passive range of motion (PROM) and functional status. These variables were compared between pre-and postsurgery by using the paired t test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank matched-pairs test. Results: One hundred and forty-one SPNs were accomplished in 33 patients. Overall mean pre-and postoperative MAS and PROM were 3.0 and 0.7 (p < 0.001) and 78.3 and 102.3° (p < 0.001), respectively. Analysis of individual SPN subgroups also demonstrated statistically significant improvement of both parameters. Furthermore, we found significant gait improvement among 10 ambulatory subjects. Nine bed-bound cases attained significant enhancement of sitting competency and ambulatory condition. Conclusion: SPN is an efficacious neurosurgical intervention in the treatment of spasticity. It is apparently beneficial in the reduction of spasticity, amelioration of functional status, facilitation of patient care and prevention of long-term musculoskeletal sequelae.